A bank’s “paramount right of set-off and general lien” over a borrower’s accounts does not extend to life-insurance proceeds received by his widow on his death, the Allahabad High Court held prima facie, ordering SBI to refund Rs 17.29 lakh it had recovered from a widow’s account towards her late husband’s personal loan. Prayagraj: The […]
The Allahabad High Court has ordered the State Bank of India to refund Rs 19.9 lakh it debited from a woman’s own fixed deposit to recover a personal loan taken by her late husband, who died of Covid, holding that she had no privity of contract with the Bank and that the money was hers. Describing the Bank’s conduct of shuffling her account between branches to make the debit as ‘abominable’ and a serious breach of trust, the Court also awarded Rs 1 lakh compensation.
The Calcutta High Court sought a detailed report on funds in frozen TMC bank accounts while questioning the speed of the West Bengal Police’s action. The Court observed that the accounts were frozen immediately after the FIR, raising concerns over the apparent haste of authorities.
Fugitive businessman Nirav Modi faced another legal setback as a London court ordered him to pay over USD 10.7 million to Bank of India in a loan recovery dispute. The Court held him personally liable for dues linked to Firestar Diamond FZE.
The Mumbai Bench of the NCLT admitted SBI’s application seeking personal insolvency proceedings against Reliance Group Chairman Anil Ambani. The Tribunal appointed a Resolution Professional and directed issuance of a public notice inviting creditor claims, marking a major development in the insolvency process.
The Delhi High Court questioned why Union Bank issued a fraud-related show cause notice to Jai Anmol Ambani after Reliance Home Finance’s resolution plan was already approved by lenders and the Supreme Court. While refusing to stay the proceedings, the Court directed the Bank to hear Ambani and pass a reasoned order, subject to the High Court’s final decision.
The Bombay High Court has stayed all coercive action by Bank of Baroda, IDBI Bank and Indian Overseas Bank against Anil Ambani. The Court held that the forensic audit relied upon was not signed by a qualified chartered accountant and cannot be the basis for fraud action.
The Delhi High Court set aside Union Bank of India’s decision to label a company linked to Jai Anmol Ambani as fraudulent, citing violation of natural justice. The Court held that no valid show cause notice was served and allowed the bank to restart the process afresh as per law.
The Supreme Court ruled that Section 35 of the SARFAESI Act cannot override any provision of the Constitution, including special protections under Article 371A for Nagaland. The Court held that SARFAESI action taken before the Act’s adoption in Nagaland was without jurisdiction and legally invalid.
The Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 2025, comes into effect on August 1, bringing key changes to bank capital norms, governance, and auditor rules. Here’s a detailed explanation.
