Sabarimala Review: Seers’ Body Tells Supreme Court “Courts Not Experts in Religious Faith”, Seeks Role in Hearing

Akhil Bharatiya Sant Samiti has moved the Supreme Court seeking to intervene in the Sabarimala review case, arguing that courts should not decide essential religious practices. The nine-judge bench will hear the matter on April 7, focusing on the balance between religious freedom and equality.

Sabarimala Review: “Courts Must Not Decide What Is Essential Religious Practice,” Muslim Personal Law Board Tells Supreme Court

The Muslim Personal Law Board told the Supreme Court that courts should not decide the “essential religious practices” of any religion. The 9-judge Bench will hear the Sabarimala review case from April 7, 2026, on the scope of religious freedom under Articles 25 and 26.