The Allahabad High Court has refused to let the State of Uttar Pradesh reopen, as collusive, a 1977 decree for ejectment, rent and damages that was maintained in appeal, second appeal and before the Supreme Court, holding that the State contested the suits at every stage. Prayagraj: The Allahabad High Court has held that decrees […]
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court asked whether citizens can be blamed for acting when officials fail, and ordered a special sitting on October 10 to decide the bail of two villagers who removed illegally laid culvert pipes.
Holding that a suo motu revision cannot be used to undo orders the State never appealed, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has dismissed the State’s challenge and upheld the restoration of a Jhabua family’s names in the records of land the State says belongs to a temple. Indore: The Madhya Pradesh High Court has refused […]
The Delhi High Court has dismissed Poonam Tanwar’s challenge to a 2012 revisional order discharging her in-laws under Section 498A and all accused under Section 406 IPC, holding the accused-wise view was reasonably open, while disapproving the Sessions Judge’s reasoning on the car variant, her return to the matrimonial home and women implicating relatives.
The Karnataka High Court has upheld a trial court’s order allowing a plaintiff to amend her plaint, holding that an amendment that only clarifies the existing cause of action, without changing the nature of the suit or setting up a new case, and which causes no prejudice to the other side, is to be allowed liberally to avoid multiplicity of litigation. The Court declined to interfere in its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227.
Orissa High Court held that orders passed by a Bench in matters outside the roster assigned by the Chief Justice are per se illegal. The Court said entertaining cases beyond allocation amounts to jurisdiction without authority, rendering such decisions fundamentally invalid.
The Allahabad High Court dismissed a challenge to the DRT Registrar’s authority, affirming the powers granted under procedural rules. It also reminded lawyers that “the learned Counsel… is not a mere mouthpiece of his client” and must reject frivolous briefs.
Delhi High Court called it “highly deplorable” that a lawyer raised his voice and tried to overawe a trial judge after being denied an adjournment. The Court said “a judge is a judge” at every level and warned that such disrespect cannot be tolerated.
The Supreme Court Today (Dec 9) expressed surprise at the Delhi High Court registry classifying a petition filed under Article 227 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) as ‘criminal writ petition’. A Bench of Justices Pankaj Mithal and Sandeep Mehta sought the response of the Registrar General of the Delhi High Court on this aspect.
The Delhi High Court affirmed High Courts’ authority over tribunal decisions, ruling on a PIL challenging statutes bypassing High Courts and sending appeals directly to the Supreme Court. The Delhi High Court has recently delivered a pivotal judgment affirming the enduring writ jurisdiction of High Courts against decisions made by various tribunals. In a case […]
