Orders Passed By Judges In Matters Outside Roster Assigned By Chief Justice are Illegal: Orissa High Court

Orissa High Court held that orders passed by a Bench in matters outside the roster assigned by the Chief Justice are per se illegal. The Court said entertaining cases beyond allocation amounts to jurisdiction without authority, rendering such decisions fundamentally invalid.

Why This Step-Motherly Treatment To Article 226 Jurisdiction?: CJI Surya Kant On Runaway Couple Plea Before Supreme Court

Today, On 20th March, The Chief Justice of India asked the lawyer to move the Delhi High Court after a runaway couple’s protection plea was mentioned before the Supreme Court of India. He questioned, “Why this step-motherly treatment to Article 226 jurisdiction?”

GST Summons Can Now Be Video graphed, Lawyers Can Be Present At Safe Distance: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court allowed videography of GST summons proceedings and permitted legal counsel to remain present at a visible but non-audible distance during questioning, reinforcing procedural safeguards in tax investigations while hearing a writ petition under Article 226.

Supreme Court of India Orders Status Quo, Stays Telangana Govt’s Land Re-Allotment Linked to Patanjali Foods Limited

The Supreme Court has stayed the Telangana government’s decision to re-allot land originally given to Patanjali Foods for an oil palm factory zone in Suryapet district. The apex court ordered status quo while hearing Patanjali Foods’ challenge against cancellation of its factory zone under the NMEO–Oil Palm scheme.

Can ED File Writs Under Article 226: Supreme Court to Decide If Central Agencies Can Bypass Article 131

The Supreme Court is set to decide whether the Enforcement Directorate can file writ petitions under Article 226, raising a key constitutional issue on whether central agencies can bypass Article 131 and approach High Courts directly in disputes with States.

“Right to Be Heard Cannot Be Ignored”: Supreme Court Says Writ Orders Without Affected Parties Are Invalid

The Supreme Court has held that any writ order passed without impleading an affected or necessary party is invalid in law. The Court ruled that the right to be heard cannot be sacrificed on procedural grounds and must prevail in writ proceedings.

Sabarimala Gold Theft Probe: Kerala High Court Allows Expansion of SIT Amid Serious Irregularity Allegations

The Kerala High Court has permitted the inclusion of two more Circle Inspector–rank officers in the SIT probing the alleged removal of gold from Sabarimala temple idols and structures. The Court said the expansion was needed due to the complexity and sensitive nature of the investigation and will review progress on January 14, 2026.

‘Dura Lex Sed Lex’: Supreme Court Restores CISF Constable’s Dismissal for Second Marriage, Slams High Court Interference

The Supreme Court set aside High Court orders and upheld the dismissal of a CISF constable for contracting a second marriage, stressing that courts cannot act as appellate authorities in disciplinary matters. Invoking “dura lex sed lex”, the Court held that hardship cannot override clear statutory rules governing disciplined forces.

Demolition in Uttar Pradesh: Supreme Court Grants One-Week Interim Protection to Petitioners

Today, On 4th December, The Supreme Court granted one-week interim protection to petitioners whose properties in Uttar Pradesh were facing demolition, directing authorities to maintain the present status. The order provides temporary relief while the Court examines the concerns raised over the demolition proceedings.

Kerala High Court Judge Flags Division Bench Overreach, Refers Intra-Court Appeal Scope to Larger Bench

Justice Mohammed Nias CP of the Kerala High Court questioned repeated interference by a Division Bench in his interim orders, calling it destructive of judicial comity. He has now sought clarity from a Larger Bench on the limits of intra-court appeals.