Supreme Court Plea By Ex-IAS Officer Challenges Centre’s Six-Stanza Anandamath Version Of National Song

Two other petitions already challenge the Home Ministry’s orders on the National Song; now a former IAS officer has moved the Supreme Court against the six-stanza Anandamath version, contending that the orders violate secularism and freedom of conscience. New Delhi: Under Article 32, a former IAS officer and ex-chairman of the Kerala State Scheduled Castes […]

Karnataka High Court Strikes Down SC/ST Quota Hike Law As Total Reservation Breaches 50% Ceiling

Can a State go past the 50% ceiling because backward classes make up most of its population? The Karnataka High Court has said no, striking down the SC/ST Quota Hike Law to the extent it took total reservation to 56%. Bengaluru: Holding that the SC/ST Quota Hike Law violates Articles 14, 15 and 16 of […]

Kerala High Court Upholds Section 69 Of Indian Succession Act, Revocation Of Wills On Marriage Valid

A will stands revoked on its maker’s marriage under Section 69 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and the Kerala High Court has now held that this rule violates no fundamental right. Kochi: Answering both questions it had framed in the negative, the Kerala High Court has held that Section 69 of the Indian Succession […]

Karnataka High Court Told Excluding Same-Sex Couples From Income Tax Spouse Benefits Violates Article 15

The Karnataka High Court was told that excluding same-sex couples from the spouse benefit under the Income Tax Act amounts to discrimination on the ground of sex and violates Article 15.

Should ‘Creamy Layer’ Apply to SC/ST Quota? Supreme Court Issues Notice on Major Reservation Challenge

The Supreme Court has agreed to examine whether the “creamy layer” principle should be implemented in SC and ST reservations. A PIL argues that allowing affluent SC/ST candidates to avail quota benefits violates equality and defeats the purpose of social justice.

Delhi HC Hears Plea on Same-Sex Partner’s Right to Give Medical Consent: “Effectively Powerless” Under Current Rules

Delhi High Court hears plea highlighting that same-sex partners are “effectively powerless” to make medical decisions for each other. Petitioner argues current rules only allow “husband or wife” to give medical consent, violating constitutional rights.

“How Are You Empowering Women by Telling Them What to Wear”? SC Slams Mumbai College for Hijab Ban

The Supreme Court has partly stayed a Mumbai college’s ban on students wearing burqa, hijab, or niqab on campus. Justices questioned the rationale behind the decision, emphasizing students’ right to choose attire. This case has significant implications for dress codes and religious expression in educational institutions across India.