“Transfer and Consolidation Are Two Sides of the Same Coin”: Delhi HC Sends Mohak Mangal-ANI Dispute to IPD Bench

Delhi High Court’s IP Division to hear YouTuber Mohak Mangal’s plea to transfer ANI’s copyright case.
The case involves allegations of copyright infringement, defamation, and misuse of ANI’s logo.

Delhi Court Stops Unacademy From Using ANI Videos On Its YouTube Channel Without Permission: “Exploiting Work For Commercial Gain”

Delhi Court barred Unacademy from using news agency ANI’s videos on its YouTube channel. The court also told Google to block all such content immediately.

BREAKING: ANI Sues YouTuber Mohak Mangal for Defamation Over Explosive Extortion Allegations

ANI has filed a defamation suit against YouTuber Mohak Mangal in the Delhi High Court, accusing him of making false claims of extortion and copyright misuse. The suit also includes comedian Kunal Kamra and activist Mohammed Zubair for sharing Mangal’s video, which ANI claims harms its reputation and misuses its trademarks.

What Indian Copyright Law Says: Mohak Mangal Accuses ANI of Extortion Over YouTube Strikes, Urges Government Action

YouTuber Mohak Mangal accused Asian News International (ANI) of misusing copyright laws to extort money from creators. After receiving strikes for using brief ANI footage, Mangal claims ANI requested ₹45-50 lakh to remove them. The situation raises concerns about copyright ethics and threatens the digital creator community in India.

BREAKING| Supreme Court Slams Delhi HC: “Not Court’s Job to Order Media to Delete”, Quashes Wikipedia Takedown in ANI Defamation Row

Today, On 9th May, The Supreme Court criticised the Delhi High Court, saying it’s “not court’s job to order media to delete content”, as it set-aside the Wikipedia takedown order in ANI’s defamation case against Wikipedia.

Supreme Court Sets Aside Delhi High Court Order to Remove Alleged Defamatory Edits from ANI’s Wikipedia Page

The Supreme Court of India overturned the Delhi High Court’s orders for removing allegedly defamatory edits on Asian News International’s Wikipedia page. The Court noted the lack of clarity in the takedown orders and permitted ANI to seek specific interim relief. It emphasized that injunctions must be precise and enforceable.

Delhi HC in ANI Case : “If Wikipedia Claims to Be an Intermediary, It Can’t Contest a Court’s Decision”

Today, On 8th April, The Delhi High Court ruled that Wikipedia, as an intermediary platform, cannot challenge court-ordered takedowns on the merits of the content. The judgment came in a case involving news agency ANI. The Court also criticized Wikipedia for lacking neutrality in its article about ANI, stating that encyclopaedias are expected to remain unbiased. The platform was directed to comply with the takedown order.