The Supreme Court dissolved a marriage under Article 142 of the Constitution, holding that the relationship had irretrievably broken down and was “dead for all practical purposes.” The Court set aside decisions of the Family Court and Andhra Pradesh High Court while directing a comprehensive financial settlement.
The Supreme Court examined concerns after a young lawyer in the Andhra Pradesh High Court was ordered into 24-hour judicial custody, prompting calls for better judicial training. It stressed that judges must act patiently and guide young lawyers.
Young members of the Bar have strongly criticised the Andhra Pradesh High Court Advocates Association over its 06 May 2026 resolution, expressing deep disappointment. They said no advocate, especially a newly enrolled lawyer, deserves to be threatened with judicial custody for placing a file loudly.
The Bar Council of India Chairman Manan Kumar Mishra has written to the Chief Justice of India seeking urgent intervention after a young Advocate was sent to 24-hour judicial custody by Justice Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao. He said the incident raises serious concerns about judicial temperament and Bar dignit
Andhra Pradesh High Court witnessed heated exchange as bench warned advocate over indolent conduct during LOC passport case hearing. Court cautioned counsel, remarking “Call the police, file appeal,” amid arguments over adjournment.
Andhra Pradesh High Court held Income Tax action based on Tax Evasion Petition valid, rejecting malice claims, noting summons under Section 131(1A) issued after due process, approvals, and material review by Investigation Wing authorities under Income Tax Act 1961.
Today, On 24th March, Supreme Court of India upheld the Andhra Pradesh High Court ruling that conversion to Christianity bars continued membership of the Scheduled Caste community. The Court held only Hindus, Sikhs or Buddhists qualify for Scheduled Caste status, conversion to any other religion, including Christianity, results in the loss of that status.
The Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled that a husband cannot demand DNA tests of his children to prove his wife’s alleged adultery. The Court stressed that children cannot be used as tools in marital disputes and their rights must be protected.
The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that a plaint can be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC only when it is clearly time-barred from the plaint itself. If limitation depends on disputed facts about when the cause of action arose, the issue must be decided after trial, not at the threshold stage.
The Supreme Court Collegium has decided that judges set to become High Court Chief Justices may be transferred nearly two months before the post falls vacant. The move aims to ensure smooth transition, better administration, and uninterrupted justice delivery across High Courts.
