The Bombay High Court has observed a rising trend of advocates wilfully disregarding court orders and escaping with an apology, and has asked the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa to take stern action against such advocates.
The Allahabad High Court has directed criminal prosecution of Advocate Prakash Pandey (Rangesh) for solemnizing the marriage of a minor in his chamber in the Kanpur Nagar District Court complex and issuing a certificate bearing a serial number already used for another couple, and has asked the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh to act for cancellation of his licence.
The Supreme Court set aside NCLT and NCLAT orders in the Essel Infraprojects insolvency case after finding reliance on fake AI-generated judicial precedents. The Court adopted a zero-tolerance approach, holding that citing unverified AI-generated judgments amounts to professional misconduct by advocates.
Allahabad High Court dismissed PIL filed by advocate, ruling lawyers cannot become petitioners for clients’ causes. Court warned such actions may constitute misconduct, stressing professional ethics and boundaries in public interest litigation proceedings before judiciary.
The Allahabad High Court has taken a stern view of misconduct, imposing a Rs.20,000 cost on a lawyer for “attempting to deceive the Court.” The bench found he filed an illness slip while appearing in another courtroom today.
The Delhi High Court upheld a commercial court order striking off a written statement after an advocate casually said “De denge” while ignoring cost payment directions. The Court called the excuse flimsy and stressed strict compliance with timelines under the Commercial Courts Act.
Jharkhand High Court takes a serious view after an advocate allegedly threatened the court during an anticipatory bail hearing in a land-grabbing case. The Bar Council chairman intervened, and the matter is under review for disciplinary action.
Madras High Court criticised media channels for running slanderous campaigns against the judiciary for profit. Emphasising judicial respect, it said, “In the name of freedom of speech and expression, one cannot condone acts of contempt.”
Advocate Harish Chandra Shukla faces contempt charges for accusing a judge of bias during a murder case bail hearing. The Allahabad High Court deemed his allegations serious misconduct and initiated criminal contempt proceedings against him. The case will be investigated further, with Justice Siddharth recusing himself from it.
A Delhi court has referred lawyer Anil Kumar Goswami to the Delhi High Court and Bar Council for his unprofessional conduct during a hearing related to the 2020 Northeast Delhi riots. The judge was offended by Goswami’s disrespectful remarks and lack of preparation, raising concerns about his professionalism and intentions in court.
