A fast-track court in Uttar Pradesh’s Sambhal sentenced a woman to life imprisonment for allegedly throwing acid on her sleeping husband, leaving him permanently blind and severely disfigured. The court imposed the maximum punishment and a fine of Rs 1.75 lakh considering the gravity of the offence.
Supreme Court of India expanded definition of acid attack victims under Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016. Bench of Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi included internal injuries and ingestion cases.
Allahabad High Court dismissed a plea to cancel an FIR in a planned acid attack linked to a property dispute, calling the allegations extremely serious. The court stressed the need for a full investigation and warned UP police over delays in submitting key injury reports.
The Allahabad High Court ruled that an FIR does not lose credibility merely because it was drafted with a lawyer’s assistance. While permitting legal help, the Court stressed careful scrutiny to rule out malice. The Bench decided this in Jagdamba Harijan’s acid attack conviction appeal.
The Supreme Court expressed shock over a 16-year pending trial of acid survivors who were forced to drink acid, calling the crime “horrendous.” The Court pulled up states and authorities for inaction and will hear the matter again after six weeks.
