The Supreme Court raised concerns over badly written arbitration clauses in commercial deals. It said the arbitration process is being misused to delay rather than resolve disputes.
New Delhi: Today, On May 15, The Supreme Court of India has raised serious concerns about how arbitration clauses are being written in commercial agreements.
On Thursday, a bench consisting of Justice Surya Kant and Justice N. Kotiswar Singh expressed worry that the purpose of arbitration—to provide a fast and effective solution to legal disputes—is not being achieved due to poor drafting practices.
Instead, they said, arbitration is being misused and is making legal matters more complicated and lengthy.
The Court clearly stated,
“The drafting of arbitration clauses in commercial agreements in India leaves much to be desired.”
This comment shows that the Court is not happy with how these legal clauses are being written in many business contracts.
The judges pointed out that while arbitration was meant to simplify the process of resolving disputes outside of traditional courts, it is now often used in the opposite way.
They said,
“Despite arbitration being introduced as a means of ensuring speedy and effective dispute resolution, it is evident and ironic that, in certain cases, the process has been misused to further complicate and prolong the resolution of disputes.”
This means that instead of solving problems quickly, arbitration is now sometimes being used to delay solutions even more.
They also criticised the confusion caused by the vague language used in these arbitration clauses. Many times, because the clauses are not clear or properly written, they lead to more disputes instead of resolving them.
The Court observed that such poorly written clauses create unnecessary legal confusion and waste time.
Because of this, the Supreme Court has now advised all courts in the country to be strict and reject badly written arbitration clauses right at the beginning.
It stressed the need for a strong and clear approach, saying courts should show an “unwavering tendency” to dismiss such poorly made clauses.
This statement shows the Court’s firm attitude toward cleaning up the way arbitration clauses are written and handled in India.
This recent observation by the Supreme Court is important for all businesses, lawyers, and contract drafters in India.
It sends a strong message that the legal system will not tolerate careless or unclear drafting of dispute resolution clauses.
The decision also highlights the need for companies and legal professionals to be more careful and precise when preparing legal contracts, especially when it comes to arbitration clauses.
In summary, the Supreme Court wants to bring back the true purpose of arbitration—quick and fair resolution of business disputes—and prevent its misuse.
ALSO READ: ‘Delhi Arbitration Review’|| DIAC Journal || Released At Delhi Arbitration Weekend 2024
This judgment is expected to bring a positive change in how commercial contracts are drafted and how arbitration is used in the Indian legal system.
Click Here to Read More On Arbitration
