Naresh Goyal, aged 74, was arrested on September 1 by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) following a First Information Report (FIR) registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The FIR was based on a complaint by Canara Bank, alleging a fraud involving approximately ₹6,000 crore
The Mumbai Court on Thursday has taken a proactive step in addressing the health concerns of Naresh Goyal, the founder of Jet Airways, who is currently embroiled in a money laundering case. The court’s directive to the state-run JJ Hospital to form a medical board to examine Goyal’s health condition comes after medical tests revealed the presence of malignant tumors in his body, marking a critical juncture in both his legal battle and personal health journey.
Also Read- “No Hope, Better To Die In Jail”: Jet Airways Founder To Court (lawchakra.in)
Naresh Goyal, aged 74, was arrested on September 1 by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) following a First Information Report (FIR) registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The FIR was based on a complaint by Canara Bank, alleging a fraud involving approximately ₹6,000 crore. This legal entanglement took a more personal turn when Goyal, citing severe health issues, sought urgent medical bail after private medical examinations uncovered malignant tumors.
The court’s decision, led by Special Judge MG Deshpande, underscores the judiciary’s recognition of the importance of health in the context of legal proceedings. The judge ordered the medical board to submit its report and opinion by February 20, focusing on Naresh Goyal sickness and the availability of necessary treatment within government facilities. This move is not just about assessing Goyal’s current health status but also about ensuring that he receives the appropriate medical care, reflecting a humane approach within the legal process.
Senior Advocate Aabad Ponda, representing Goyal, emphasized the gravity of his client’s health condition, describing it as encompassing numerous life-threatening medical issues.
Also Read- Bombay High Court Rejects Naresh Goyal’s Habeas Corpus Petition In PMLA Case (lawchakra.in)
“Naresh Goyal is 74 years old and suffers from numerous life-threatening medical conditions. It is stated that he falls within the meaning of the phrase ‘sick or infirm’ as used in the proviso to section 45(1) of the PMLA,”
Ponda submitted, urging the court to constitute the medical board at the earliest. This highlights the urgency of providing Naresh Goyal with the necessary medical intervention, potentially involving aggressive treatment options such as surgery or chemotherapy, as indicated by the presence of Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and other health concerns detailed in Goyal’s medical reports.
The court’s directive was a response to a request made by Special Public Prosecutor Sunil Gonsalves for the ED, reflecting a collaborative effort to address the health concerns of individuals under legal scrutiny. This approach demonstrates a balanced consideration of legal responsibilities and the fundamental rights of individuals to health and well-being.
Goyal’s medical condition, including a precancerous condition known as Barrett’s Esophagus and other significant health issues, has necessitated a comprehensive evaluation and a potentially aggressive line of treatment. The involvement of JJ Hospital and the formation of a medical board represent a critical step in ensuring that Goyal receives the necessary medical attention, while also addressing the legal dimensions of his case.
This case highlights the intersection of health and law, showcasing the complexities involved when legal proceedings intersect with serious health issues. The Mumbai Court’s actions reflect an acknowledgment of the need to balance legal processes with compassion and care for the health of individuals involved in such cases. As the medical board convenes and further developments unfold, this case will likely continue to be a focal point for discussions on the relationship between justice, healthcare, and human rights.
Also Read- Law Commission Proposes Mandatory Registration Of NRI-Indian Marriages (lawchakra.in)
