Parliament Today (April 4) early morning passed the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, aiming to reform Waqf property management and uplift poor Muslims, especially women. The bill sparked intense debate but was cleared with majority support in both Houses.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
NEW DELHI: The Indian Parliament has officially passed the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, after the Rajya Sabha gave its approval today.
A total of 128 members voted in favour of the bill, while 95 members opposed it.
The Upper House of Parliament held a 12-hour-long discussion before clearing the bill.
The Lok Sabha had already passed the bill earlier.
The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025 has been brought with the aim of improving the management of Waqf properties, which are religious endowments made under Islamic law. The bill promises to protect heritage sites, promote social welfare, and increase transparency in how Waqf properties are managed.
It also aims to ensure better cooperation between Waqf Boards and local authorities, safeguard the rights of stakeholders, and enhance the social and economic condition of Muslim women, especially widows and divorced women.
Another key feature is the effort to make the Waqf Board more inclusive, with representation from different Muslim sects, allowing for better decision-making and more effective governance.
The law also tries to create a transparent and secular system for handling Waqf matters. With this new system, the government wants to establish fairness, accountability, and strong checks and balances in the working of the Waqf Boards.
Replying to the debate on the bill, Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said,
“Crores of poor Muslims will be benefited from this legislation and in no way it harms any single Muslim.”
He also clarified that
“The legislation does not interfere in the Waqf properties.”
He assured the House that
“Narendra Modi government works with the vision of Sabka Saath and Sabka Vikas and it does not discriminate with any community.”
He further mentioned,
“Poor and Pasmanda Muslims came to meet him and urged that the bill should be passed soon.”
He added that
“The government wants to bring the Muslims into the mainstream of the country.”
Kiren Rijiju also explained that the Joint Parliamentary Committee had listened to all the views and that those suggestions were included in the final draft of the bill. He shared that
“There will be 22 members in the Central Waqf Council including the ex-officio members and in the Council, there will not be more than four non-Muslim members.”
Additionally, he clarified that
“Out of the eleven members of the Waqf Board, only three will be non-Muslims.”
He stated that while the Waqf Board is a statutory body and should be secular, the government still chose to limit the number of non-Muslims on it.
While moving the bill, Minister Kiren Rijiju had earlier told the House that the bill was prepared
“after a detailed consultation with the stakeholders as well as in the Joint Parliamentary Committee.”
He asked opposition parties to support it. Responding to criticisms, he clarified,
“Only Muslim can get the benefit of Waqf and it is not correct that any non-Muslim will interfere in the management of Waqf properties.”
He also said,
“The bill is intended to ensure better management of Waqf properties and not to interfere in the religious practice of Muslims.”
He noted that
“The Waqf Boards will have representations of all different sects of Muslim and women to make it inclusive.”
During the debate, Dr. Syed Naseer Hussain from Congress strongly opposed the bill. He said,
“This bill is misleading and it has been brought with the intention of communal polarisation.”
He also accused the BJP of
“trying to divide the communities.”
He said that under the BJP government,
“The budget was not allocated for Waqf council and salaries were not paid to the employees of the council.”
At this point, Union Home Minister Amit Shah interrupted him and said,
“The opposition is trying to mislead the people.”
JP Nadda, Union Minister and Leader of the House, urged support for UMEED – Unified Waqf Management Empowerment, Efficiency and Development. He said,
“The basic aim of this Bill is to bring in reforms and proper management of Waqf properties.”
He also called for parties to
“rise above vote bank politics and work in favour of national interest.”
Opposing the bill, Tiruchi Siva from DMK said,
“A certain community is being targeted.”
He added,
“The bill is anti-secular and unconstitutional.”
Mohd Nadimul Haque of TMC said,
“The bill is against the fundamental rights of the people.”
He accused the government, saying,
“The identity of Waqf is weakened in the name of reforms.”
Sanjay Singh of Aam Aadmi Party called the bill “unconstitutional” and asked the government to withdraw it.
He said,
“The government is misleading the people.”
Prof. Manoj Kumar Jha from RJD also raised concerns about the
“intent and content of the bill.”
Radha Mohan Das from BJP defended the bill by blaming past governments, saying,
“No work was done to improve the lives of poor Muslims during the Congress rule.”
He supported Prime Minister Modi, saying,
“Prime Minister Narendra Modi brought this bill for the betterment of poor Muslim communities.”
He also added,
“The Modi government has implemented several schemes like Jan Dhan Yojana, Ujjwala Yojana and the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana through which Muslim community also benefited.”
HD Devegowda, JD(S) chief, praised the bill and said,
“Waqf properties have been misused by people who are rich or strong enough in the community.”
He assured that
“The bill does not interfere with Muslims religious practices but strictly deals with revenue and administration matters.”
Sanjay Raut of Shiv Sena (UBT) criticized the bill and said,
“This Bill is not in the favour of the nation.”
Dr Ram Gopal Yadav from Samajwadi Party shared his fear, saying,
“The country is moving towards a totalitarian state instead of a democratic state.”
He said,
“This would be worrisome for all.”
He urged the government,
“To work for the welfare of all communities.”
Leader of the Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge rejected the bill and asked the government to withdraw it. He said,
“There are shortcomings in the bill and it is against the Constitutional norms.”
Dr M Thambidurai of AIADMK said,
“The government has brought the legislation to change the composition of Waqf Boards and Waqf Board Council.”
He added that
“AIADMK is committed to the welfare of the minority.”
Sudhanshu Trivedi of BJP said,
“The government has brought this bill for the welfare of poor Muslims.”
He also accused the opposition, saying,
“The opposition parties are indulging in appeasement politics.”
Minister of State for Social Justice and Empowerment Ramdas Athawale said,
“The bill is not unconstitutional as it integrates every minority community.”
Several other Members of Parliament also participated in the discussion including Abhishek Manu Singhvi of Congress, Praful Patel of NCP, Dr Fauzia Khan of NCP-SCP, Gulam Ali (Nominated), Milind Murli Deora of Shiv Sena, and Jose K Mani of KC(M).
Along with this, the Parliament also approved the Mussalman Wakf (Repeal) Bill, 2025, which officially repeals the Mussalman Wakf Act of 1923. The Rajya Sabha passed the repeal bill today, and it had already been approved by the Lok Sabha earlier.
EARLIER IN LOK SHABA
On April 3, 2025, early morning around 2 AM, the Lok Sabha passed the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025 after a long and intense debate of over 12 hours.
The Bill had been introduced in the House on Wednesday, April 2, by Union Minister Kiren Rijiju. It received support from 288 MPs, while 232 MPs opposed it, making it a close and heated matter.
While presenting the Bill, Kiren Rijiju made it clear that the proposed law does not interfere with any religious rights of Muslims and is only about managing Waqf properties better.
He said,
“If we had not come up with this legislation, even Parliament building would have been claimed as waqf.”
Union Home Minister Amit Shah also spoke to clear doubts about the amendment and said there was no interference in Muslim religious matters.
He addressed the Muslim community directly and stated,
“I would like to tell Muslims in the country that not even one non-Muslim will come into your waqf.”
BJP MP Tejasvi Surya supported the Bill strongly and said it corrects a past injustice, calling it a way to fix what he described as a historical mistake by the Congress party.
He said the Bill would
“undo the constitutional fraud imposed on the country by the Congress party.”
However, many opposition MPs expressed their strong disagreement.
Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi from Assam criticized the Bill and called it an
“attack on the basic structure of the Constitution.”
Kalyan Banerjee, MP from All India Trinamool Congress (AITC) in West Bengal, said the Bill takes away the right of Muslims to handle their own religious affairs, which is protected under Article 26 of the Constitution. He argued the Bill was a clear violation of this fundamental right.
Congress MP KC Venugopal also accused the ruling party of targeting religious minorities, saying,
“The world is watching as you try to divide this country for political benefit.”
NK Premachandran, MP from Kerala and a leader of the Revolutionary Socialist Party (RSP), criticized the rule about including non-Muslim members on Waqf Boards. He questioned,
“You have made non-muslim members mandatory on waqf board. Will you say that for devaswom boards of temples?”
Abdul Rashid Sheikh, an independent MP from Jammu and Kashmir, pointed out that the Bill was being passed only because the ruling party has more MPs in Parliament. He said,
“We all know this Bill will be passed because they have the majority …I want to tell Muslims of this country that this is a numbers game for them and you are stuck in between.”
K Francis George, MP from Kerala Congress and a lawyer, commented that the controversial Munambam-Waqf land dispute in Kerala cannot be solved by this new law alone. He said,
“Munambam dispute can be resolved by making ambiguous provisions of the Act unambiguous, and it can be done without affecting the fundamental rights of Muslims.”
In a strong show of protest, AIMIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi even tore a copy of the Bill inside the House. He said,
“When you say waqf council and board are religion neutral, you can nominate your pawns. What kind of mockery of democracy is this?”
What Is the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025 About?
The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025 is a law that changes parts of the existing Waqf Act, 1995. The goal is to make the management of Waqf properties more efficient, transparent, and modern.
The original Waqf Act was made to regulate and manage Waqf properties – these are properties given for religious or charity purposes under Islamic law.
The Bill was first introduced in August 2024 and later sent to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC), which made some suggestions for changes.
Now, it has been officially passed by the Lok Sabha.
Key Changes Proposed in the Bill
- The Bill renames the original Act as the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency, and Development Act to reflect a broader goal of better management.
- Earlier, any long-term use or endowment could be declared as Waqf. But now, only a person who has practiced Islam for at least five years and owns the property can declare it as waqf. This removes the earlier idea of “waqf by user.”
- It also ensures that waqf-alal-aulad (waqf for family) cannot deny inheritance rights to legal heirs, including women.
- The Bill removes the power of Waqf Boards to decide whether a property is Waqf or not.
- The original law required all members of the Central Waqf Council to be Muslims, but the Bill now says that two members must be non-Muslims. MPs, judges, and other experts appointed to the Council don’t have to be Muslims. However, Muslim scholars, leaders, and board chairpersons must be Muslims, and at least two of them must be women.
- The Central Government gets more power to make rules for registration and auditing of Waqf accounts and the functioning of Waqf Boards.
- Earlier, State governments could audit Waqf accounts. Now, the Central government can ask the CAG or other officers to do the audit.
- The Bill also allows for separate Waqf Boards not just for Sunni and Shia, but also for smaller sects like Aghakhani and Bohra.
- One big change is about legal disputes: Earlier, decisions made by Waqf Tribunals were final and couldn’t be challenged in regular courts. But now, these decisions can be appealed in High Courts within 90 days.
The passing of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a significant change in how Waqf properties will be managed in India. While the government says the law will improve transparency and stop misuse of Waqf, many opposition leaders believe it interferes with religious freedom and the rights of Muslims.
The public debate and strong reactions from both sides show that this law will remain in public discussion for a long time.
Detailed Parliament Proceedings
The most important change is the removal of Section 40, which earlier allowed the Waqf Board to convert any land into Waqf property, without asking the owner.
Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju called this part of the law the “most draconian” rule. During the discussion in Parliament, he said,
“The most draconian provision in the Act was Section 40, under which the Waqf Board could declare any land Waqf property. But we have removed that provision.”
Rijiju spoke in Parliament to support the Bill after presenting it in the Lok Sabha. He said that the new law will not take away any land from the Muslim community, even though some leaders from the Opposition are saying so. He made it clear that the Bill has a retrospective effect, meaning it will apply to cases from the past too.
He also said the Bill will now be called the UMEED Bill, which stands for Unified Waqf Management Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Bill.
He further said that Section 40 was being misused by some people for their own benefit, which caused a big rise in Waqf properties. Rijiju said,
“That is why Waqf property increased by lakhs.”
Before this change, under Section 40 of the Waqf Act, the Waqf Board had the power to decide whether a property should be marked as Waqf property. Their decision was final unless changed by the Waqf Tribunal.
Also, once the Tribunal gave a decision, people were not allowed to challenge it in court. This was written clearly in the Waqf Act and was mentioned by the Ministry of Minority Affairs.
But the new Bill now removes this rule. Now, if someone is unhappy with the Waqf Tribunal’s decision, they can go to the High Court within 90 days.
According to Rijiju, there are more than 14,000 court cases currently going on about Waqf properties. He added,
“If unhappy with Waqf Board and Tribunal decisions, one can now approach the courts,”
saying that the legal process has now been made easier for common people.
As per the new Bill, the power to decide whether a property is Waqf or not will now be with the District Collector, not the Waqf Board.
Leaders from the BJP have said that Section 40 was misused, and because of that, many private lands were wrongly taken over and made Waqf properties. This caused tension between different communities in the country.
Kiren Rijiju also said,
“The Catholic Christian community wants the Waqf Bill to be passed at the earliest.”
He gave an example from Cherai village in Kochi, Kerala. In this fishing village, more than 600 Christian families and a church complained to the Joint Parliamentary Committee that their land was being wrongly claimed as Waqf land.
Another example was from Jathlana village in Haryana, where land belonging to a gurdwara was being claimed as Waqf property.
The UMEED Bill also removes the old rule of ‘Waqf by user’, which allowed any place to become Waqf property if it was used for religious purposes for a long time.
ALSO READ: Waqf Amendment Bill 2024 Sparks Parliament Showdown: Centre vs Opposition Today (April 2)
As per the new rule, only a Muslim person who has been practising Islam for at least five years can declare a property as Waqf, and the property must be owned by that person.
To explain how the old law was being misused, Rijiju said that even important government buildings like the Parliament building, Delhi airport, and the CGO complex could have been wrongly declared as Waqf property. The new law wants to stop such things from happening.
With Section 40 now removed, no one can now just declare land as Waqf without following proper process.
He clearly said that the new amendment will allow people from different religious backgrounds and women to be part of the board.
He pointed out that currently there are no women members in the Central Waqf Council, which controls the Waqf Boards across India. But under this new bill, there will now be mandatory inclusion of two women, and up to four non-Muslim experts can also be added.
“At present, there are no women in the Waqf Board. Under the new amendment, Shias, Sunnis, Bohras, Agha Khanis, backward Muslims, women, and non-Muslim experts will all be represented,”
-he said.
To make it more relatable, Rijiju gave his own example. He explained how a non-Muslim like him, who is the Minority Affairs Minister, can still be the Chairman of the Central Waqf Council.
This shows that even non-Muslims can be involved in Waqf matters for better representation.
“I’ll give my own example. Suppose I am not a Muslim but I am the Minority Affairs Minister. Then I become Chairman of the Central Waqf Council. Despite my position, there can be a maximum of four non-Muslim members in the Council, and among them, two women members are compulsory.”
He also explained why non-Muslims should be included in the Waqf Board. According to him, the Waqf Board is not the owner of any Waqf land or property but only acts as a manager or caretaker. He compared this to how even temple management is handled by non-Hindus in some court cases, saying that such duties are secular in nature.
“You should welcome everyone. There is no need for anyone to object,”
–Rijiju added.
Rijiju gave more information about the structure of the Central Waqf Council under the new law. The Council will now have 22 members, with not more than four being non-Muslims, and at least two of them must be women.
He also shared that the Council will have three ex-officio members, three MPs from different religious communities, and judges from the Supreme Court and High Courts. The State Waqf Boards will also be restructured in a similar way. Each board will have 11 members, and at least two of them must be Muslim women.
While responding to criticism from the opposition, especially the Congress party, Rijiju accused them of spreading false information just for political gain. He assured the public that the bill is not meant to harm Muslims or take away their rights.
“No land will be snatched under the Waqf bill.”
He dismissed the rumours and fears about the bill, firmly stating that Muslim rights and properties are safe under the new law.
“No land will be snatched under the Waqf bill.”
Kiren Rijiju clearly told the Parliament that the new Waqf Bill is not against any religion or community, and that it has been brought to make the management of waqf properties better and more transparent in the country.
He said the bill would not take away any rights from Muslims and tried to clear all doubts by saying:
“No land will be snatched under the Waqf Bill.”
The Waqf Amendment Bill, 2024, plans to make changes to the original Waqf Act of 1995. According to the government, this new bill will solve earlier problems and help Waqf Boards to work more smoothly and efficiently. It also promotes digital record-keeping and aims to make the registration of Waqf properties faster and more accurate.
In his speech, Rijiju explained how this bill was discussed in great detail by a Joint Committee of both Houses of Parliament. He said that such deep discussion has never happened before in India’s parliamentary history.
He said:
“I want to say that the discussion that has taken place on the Waqf Amendment Bill in the Joint Committee of both the Houses has never been done in the parliamentary history of India till date. I thank and congratulate all the members of the Joint Committee…Till date, a total of 284 delegations from the state holders of different communities have presented their views and suggestions before the committee. Waqf boards of 25 state governments and union territories have also presented their submissions…”
Rijiju also spoke about an old court case from 1970 related to several important government properties in Delhi, including the CGO Complex and even the Parliament building itself. He said that the Delhi Waqf Board had claimed those properties as Waqf land and that the earlier UPA government had made decisions that could have serious impacts today.
He warned that if changes were not made now, the Parliament building itself could have been declared as Waqf land.
He said:
“A case ongoing since 1970 in Delhi involved several properties, including the CGO Complex and the Parliament building. The Delhi Waqf Board had claimed these as Waqf properties. The case was in court, but at that time, the UPA government denotified 123 properties and handed them over to the Waqf Board. If we had not introduced this amendment today, even the Parliament building we are sitting in could have been claimed as Waqf property. If PM Modi Govt did not come into power, several properties would have been de-notified…”
Rijiju also accused the Congress Party of making confusing changes to the Waqf Act in 2013, just before the 2014 Lok Sabha elections. He said that Congress allowed non-Muslims like Hindus, Sikhs, and Parsis to create Waqf, which goes against the very concept of Waqf being a religious endowment made only by Muslims in the name of Allah.
He said Congress even gave special powers to Shia boards and included a section that gave Waqf more power than other laws, which he said is not acceptable.
He added:
“In 2013, right before Lok Sabha elections in 2014, there were some steps taken which will raise questions in your mind. In 2013, the act was changed to allow Sikhs, Hindus, Parsis and others to create Waqf. Everyone knows Waqf is for Muslims to create Waqf in the name of Allah. This change was made by Congress in 2013. Congress made the boards specifics, only Shias in Shia boards…A section was added that Waqf will have an overriding effect over every other law. How can this section be acceptable?…”
The bill is currently under discussion, and both supporters and critics are watching closely. The government says it is trying to protect national interests and ensure justice for all communities, while the Opposition says they need to study the bill carefully to safeguard minority rights.
While introducing the Bill, Kiren Rijiju appreciated the efforts of the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) that worked hard on the bill. He said that the committee discussed the matter in detail and gave good suggestions. He congratulated them by saying,
“I congratulate members of the JPC for its thorough deliberations and recommendations.”
However, Rijiju also said that even though the changes in the bill are positive and useful, some people are still questioning them. He added that there are people who are spreading confusion and provoking others who are connected to this issue. He warned that such actions could mislead those involved.
Rijiju said,
“The provisions introduce positive changes but they are still being questioned.”
He further pointed out that
“those involved in the bill are being provoked and misled.”
The Minister also spoke about how waqf laws have been made and changed in India over time. He explained that a lot of people and organizations took part in the process of making this new amendment. According to him, more than 7,700 petitions were received during the consultation period, which is the highest number ever received for any law in India. In addition, 248 delegations and waqf boards from 25 states and union territories gave their suggestions and opinions to the JPC.
Rijiju proudly stated,
“Recommendations were received from over 7,700 petitions during consultation, the highest ever for any legislation. 248 delegations and waqf boards of 25 states and union territories gave their recommendations to JPC.”
While speaking in the Lok Sabha, Rijiju also strongly criticised the previous UPA government for the amendment it made to the Waqf Act in 2013. He said that the way the law was changed during that time gave it more power than other laws. This, he argued, was not right. Rijiju said,
“The Act was given overriding effect over other legislations.”
To highlight the seriousness of the issue, Rijiju made a shocking statement, saying that if this new bill had not been brought forward, even the Parliament building could have been claimed as waqf property. He said,
“If we had not come up with this legislation, even parliament building would have been claimed as waqf.”
After his statement, there was a lot of noise and protest inside the house, showing how controversial and sensitive this matter is.
Waqf refers to properties dedicated exclusively for religious or charitable purposes under Islamic law, such as maintaining mosques and graveyards, establishing educational institutions and healthcare facilities, or providing financial aid to the poor and disabled.
Any other use or sale of these properties is prohibited.
Would You Like Assistance In Drafting A Legal Notice Or Complaint?
CLICK HERE
Click Here to Read Our Reports on Waqf
FOLLOW US ON YOUTUBE FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES
