The Supreme Court of India has sought the Central Government’s response on a plea challenging the automatic termination of Indian citizenship upon acquiring another country’s citizenship. The plea, filed by a professor from the London School of Economics (LSE), contends that such automatic termination is unconstitutional.
The petitioner, an LSE professor, argues against the provision in the Citizenship Act, 1955, which mandates the automatic cessation of Indian citizenship when a person voluntarily acquires the citizenship of another country. In the plea, the professor was quoted saying,
“The automatic termination of Indian citizenship on acquiring another citizenship is violative of the fundamental right to equality, life, and personal liberty.”
Highlighting the global trend of dual citizenship and the benefits it offers, the petitioner further stated,
“In an era of global mobility and increasing inter-connectedness, the recognition of dual citizenship can be immensely beneficial for individuals who can contribute to both their countries of origin and residence.”
The plea also emphasizes the emotional and psychological strain that individuals face due to the forced renunciation of their original citizenship. It points out that many countries, recognizing the advantages of dual citizenship, have amended their laws to accommodate it.
The Supreme Court’s decision to seek the Centre’s viewpoint on this matter underscores the significance of the issue, especially in the context of an increasingly globalized world. The outcome of this case could potentially reshape the way India perceives dual citizenship and its implications for the Indian diaspora worldwide.
Legal experts and the Indian expatriate community are keenly watching the developments, as the judgment could have far-reaching consequences for millions of Indians living abroad.
