On 7th March, Delhi Police requested a 90-day extension from the Patiala House Court to investigate the high-profile Parliament security breach on December 13, 2023. The incident involved individuals leaping into the Lok Sabha chamber, prompting questions about safety protocols.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
DELHI: Today(on 7th March),the Delhi Police have approached the Patiala House Court, requesting additional time to delve deeper into the Parliament security breach incident. This case, marked by its complexity and the high-profile nature of the security lapse, has led to the police seeking an extension of 90 days to thoroughly complete their investigation.
On December 13, 2023, the Indian Parliament witnessed an unprecedented security breach that raised questions about the safety protocols in place. During the Zero Hour, a startling scene unfolded as two individuals, identified as Sharma and Manoranjan D, leaped into the Lok Sabha chamber from the public gallery.
ALSO READ: Delhi Court Rejects Bail for Neelam Azad in Parliament Security Breach Case
They released a yellow gas from canisters and vocally expressed their dissent before being subdued by the present Members of Parliament. Concurrently, outside the Parliament premises, two other individuals, Shinde and Azad, were involved in a similar act, dispersing a colored gas while exclaiming, “tanashahi nahi chalegi” (dictatorship will not work), adding to the chaos and urgency of the situation.
The Special Cell of Delhi Police, represented by Special Public Prosecutor Akhand Pratap Singh, has formally petitioned for an extension, citing the sensitive nature of the case and the voluminous digital data that requires thorough examination. Additional Sessions Judge Dr. Hardeep Kaur, acknowledging the preliminary stage of the investigation and the serious allegations involved, has issued notices to all accused, including Neelam Azad, Manoranjan D, Sagar Sharma, Lalit Jha, Amol Shinde, and Mahesh Kumawat, setting a deadline for their responses by March 11, 2024.
The court, while addressing the bail plea of one of the accused, Neelam Azad, underscored the severity of the allegations.
ALSO READ:Parliament Security Breach: Accused Alleging Torture to Have Hearing on March 11
The judge remarked-
“considering the nature and seriousness of allegations leveled against the applicant/accused and the initial stage of investigation, I do not find it to be a fit case to release the applicant/accused on bail.”
This statement reflects the judiciary’s cautious approach in handling cases that potentially threaten the sovereignty and integrity of the nation.
The incident, occurring on the anniversary of the 2001 Parliament terror attack, has reignited discussions on national security and the measures in place to protect key democratic institutions. The Delhi Police’s assertion that the accused persons are “powerful and influential” and could adversely affect the investigation if released on bail, highlights the complexities and challenges inherent in ensuring justice in high-stakes cases.
ALSO READ:Update: Delhi Court Extends Judicial Custody of Parliament Security Breach Accused
