Delhi excise scam, on Thursday the Enforcement Directorate (ED) has approached a New Delhi court with serious allegations against the accused in Delhi excise scam.
In ongoing Delhi excise scam, on Thursday (February 7) the Enforcement Directorate (ED) has approached a New Delhi court with serious allegations against the accused in Delhi excise scam. The central probe agency claims that the individuals implicated in the money laundering case are employing delay tactics to hinder the legal proceedings.
Also Read- BREAKING|| Arvind Kejriwal Scam | Delhi Court Summons Chief Minister (lawchakra.in)
ED’s Allegations in Court
During a session before Special Judge M K Nagpal, the ED voiced its concerns, particularly opposing the accused’s request for copies of CCTV footage, which includes audio and video recordings from their interrogation period. The agency argues that this demand is an attempt to stall the trial’s progress.
The ED’s application to the court emphasized the need for the accused to cooperate with the trial and to
“prevent them from causing unnecessary delay in commencement and conclusion of the trial.”
This move by the ED underscores the agency’s intent to expedite the legal process and bring about a timely conclusion.
Misuse of Information Allegations
Adding to the complexity of the case, the ED has also accused the suspects of misusing the information, including CCTV footage, previously provided to them. According to the agency, AAP leaders have been using this material to launch “baseless defamatory” attacks against the investigators in various media outlets.
The central probe agency maintains that the request for additional footage by the accused lacks a substantial basis and is therefore not justifiable at the current stage of the proceedings.
Defense’s Counterclaims
In contrast, Advocate Nitesh Rana, representing one of the accused, has countered the ED’s claims, labeling the agency’s application as “frivolous.” Rana asserts that the request for CCTV footage is a legitimate part of the legal process, aiming to ensure transparency and fairness in the inquiry.
“The ED wanted to skip the process of inquiry in the matter with its ‘frivolous’ application,”
Rana stated, defending the rights of the accused to access evidence that may be pertinent to their defense.
The Path Forward
The court, presided over by Judge M K Nagpal, is set to delve further into these allegations and counterclaims in the upcoming hearing scheduled for March 19. This case, part of the broader Delhi excise scam investigation, continues to unravel, shedding light on the intricate and often contentious interactions between the prosecution, defense, and investigative agencies.
As the trial progresses, the legal strategies employed by both sides will be under scrutiny, especially in the context of the ED’s allegations of delay tactics. The outcome of these proceedings could have significant implications for the accused and the broader investigation into the alleged excise scam, highlighting the ongoing battle between due process and the pursuit of swift justice.
Also Read- Bloomberg Challenges Delhi High Court’s Order To Remove Zee Article (lawchakra.in)
