The Kerala High Court declared that parents can be prosecuted under Section 199A of the Motor Vehicles Act if their minor children are caught driving a vehicle without a valid license. Section 199A of the Motor Vehicles Act is a legal provision aimed at ensuring that motor vehicles are operated only by individuals who possess the necessary legal authorization—a valid driving license.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
KOCHI: The Kerala High Court declared that parents or guardians can be prosecuted under Section 199A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, if they permit minors to drive vehicles without a license. This significant ruling came as a response to multiple petitions challenging the legal provisions that hold parents accountable for their children’s traffic violations.
The case, titled Sharafudheen v. State of Kerala (Crl.M.C. No. 34/2024 & Conn. Cases), was overseen by Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas. The leading incident in this case involved a minor driving a motorbike without a license on March 18, 2023. The minor was allowed to drive by the vehicle owner, leading to charges under Section 199A of the MV Act and Section 336 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
Legal Issues Addressed
Scope of Section 199A of the MV Act: The court examined whether this provision creates an independent offense for parents or vehicle owners when a minor drives without a license.
Necessity of Convicting the Juvenile: The court considered if it was necessary to convict the juvenile or lay charges against them before initiating proceedings against the guardian or vehicle owner.
Time Limit for Investigation: The court discussed the time limits for completing investigations into offenses committed by juveniles.
Impact of Previous Judgments: The court evaluated the relevance of previous decisions in Polachan v. State of Kerala and Sameera v. State of Kerala.
Court’s Decision
Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas provided a detailed judgment addressing each issue:
Scope of Section 199A: The court clarified that Section 199A creates a sui generis offense, holding parents or vehicle owners accountable for allowing minors to drive without a license. This provision imposes a duty on guardians to prevent such offenses and does not require the juvenile to be prosecuted alongside the parent or owner.
Conviction of the Juvenile: The court ruled that it is not necessary to convict the juvenile or lay charges against them before prosecuting the guardian or vehicle owner. The mere recording of the offense in the General Diary and the submission of a Social Background Report (SBR) are sufficient to initiate proceedings under Section 199A.
Time Limit for Investigation: While the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Model Rules, 2016, prescribe a two-month period for filing the final report, the court emphasized that this provision is directory and not mandatory. The investigation should be completed promptly, but delays do not automatically invalidate the proceedings.
Impact of Previous Judgments: The court declared the decisions in Polachan v. State of Kerala and Sameera v. State of Kerala as per incuriam, meaning they were rendered without considering the relevant provisions of the Juvenile Justice Act. Therefore, these decisions do not hold precedence in the current context.
Important Observations
Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas made several significant observations:
- “The provision is intended to impose affirmative duties on persons responsible for the juvenile or owner of the vehicle to prevent the commission of offenses by minors.”
- “The criminal act or the actus reus of the parent or owner is the conduct of permitting or allowing the juvenile to have access to the motor vehicle, while the criminal intent or mens rea is the knowledge that such a juvenile cannot drive a vehicle.”
Case Details
- Case Title: Sharafudheen v. State of Kerala
- Case Number: Crl.M.C. No. 34/2024 & Conn. Cases
- Bench: Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas
- Lawyers for Petitioners: Adv. Thareeq Anver, Adv. K.M. Firoze, Adv. P.C. Muhammed Noushiq, Adv. K.K. Dheerendra Krishnan, Adv. K. Rakesh, Adv. Nima Meriam Koshy
- Lawyers for the State: Sri. K.A. Noushad, Smt. Sreeja V., Sri. T.R. Renjith, Sri. M.A. Ashi
This judgment sets a crucial precedent, highlighting the legal responsibilities of parents and vehicle owners in preventing minors from engaging in traffic violations.
Click Here to Read Previous Reports on Minors’ Driving Vehicle
FOLLOW US ON YOUTUBE FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES
