The Madhya Pradesh High Court reduced a man’s conviction for killing his pregnant wife, ruling that the act occurred during grave and sudden provocation. The Court changed the offence from Section 304 Part I IPC to Part II and reduced the sentence to seven years.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has partially reduced the conviction of a man accused of killing his pregnant wife, holding that the incident occurred in the heat of grave and sudden provocation allegedly triggered by a remark made by the deceased during an argument.
A Division Bench comprising Justice Vivek Agarwal and Justice Avanindra Kumar Singh partly allowed the appeal filed by Shiva. The appellant had challenged the trial court’s decision convicting him under Section 304 Part I of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and awarding a sentence of life imprisonment. The High Court altered the conviction to Section 304 Part II IPC and reduced the punishment to seven years’ rigorous imprisonment, while keeping the fine imposed by the trial court unchanged.
According to the prosecution, the incident occurred on the night of July 18–19, 2021, near the Kulbaheri river at Kharra Ghat in the Chhindwara district. The prosecution case was that Shiva caused the death of his wife Kiran by pelting stones at her after a quarrel. The material on record further indicated that immediately after the incident, Shiva himself contacted Kiran’s relatives and informed them that he had killed her.
During the hearing, Advocate Jagat Kumar Dehariya argued for the appellant, while Government Advocate Ajay Shukla appeared for the State. The testimony of witnesses revealed that Shiva claimed he became enraged after Kiran allegedly said that she could have “a thousand husbands” like him. Shivram Kahar, a relative of the deceased, stated that the accused admitted to having hit Kiran with a stone upon hearing the remark. Other family members and witnesses broadly supported the prosecution story and also described similar admissions attributed to Shiva shortly after the incident.
The medical evidence showed that Kiran, who was about seven months pregnant, sustained grave injuries, including fractures to several ribs and the sternum. The postmortem doctor opined that Kiran died due to cardiorespiratory failure resulting from severe injuries to vital organs. The doctor further confirmed that the injuries could have been caused by the stone recovered during the investigation.
ALSO READ: Bhopal Twisha Death Case: BCI Suspends Accused Husband Advocate Samarth Singh
The Bench also noted that multiple witnesses including police personnel and court witnesses deposed that the accused reached out to the police and others promptly after the occurrence and admitted his role. The Court treated this conduct as an important factor in evaluating the nature of the offence.
In deciding whether the act amounted to murder, the Court considered Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC, which deals with grave and sudden provocation. The judges observed that there was no indication of premeditation and that the stone used in the assault was lying nearby. They also took into account that Shiva informed both the police and the relatives about what had happened.
Relying on Supreme Court precedent, the Bench referred to Nawaz v. State represented by Inspector of Police, where the conviction for murder was altered after the Court found that insulting remarks aimed at the accused and her daughter caused a sudden loss of self-control.
ALSO READ: Murdered Woman Found Alive || Karnataka Man Jailed for 1.5 Years, Court Seeks SP Report
Drawing a similar conclusion, the High Court held that the wife’s statement “a thousand husbands” amounted to an indirect attack on the husband’s worth and dignity.
The Court observed:
“it is indirect/oblique reference to worthlessness of the husband, meaning he has no value as a human being or a husband. Therefore, it can be turned as a sudden and grave provocation.”
Ultimately, while the Court held Shiva responsible for Kiran’s death, it found that the circumstances were not sufficient to sustain a conviction under Section 304 Part I IPC. Instead, the Bench concluded the case would be covered under Section 304 Part II IPC, sentencing Shiva to seven years’ rigorous imprisonment and maintaining the fine imposed by the trial court. Accordingly, the appeal was partly allowed.
Case Title: Shiva v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
FOLLOW US FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES ON YOUTUBE