Calcutta High Court has sought an explanation from a group of doctors regarding the medical termination of a minor petitioner’s pregnancy. This action came after the court had specifically ordered the formation of a Medical Board to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of proceeding with the pregnancy termination, rather than authorizing the procedure itself. The court’s request for an explanation underscores the need for clarity and adherence to legal protocols in sensitive medical decisions, particularly when they involve minors and are under judicial consideration.
The Calcutta High Court has found itself at the center of a controversial case involving the premature termination of a pregnancy. The case, which has sparked debates over medical ethics and legal oversight, came to light when a woman, referred to as the petitioner, sought the court’s permission for the termination of her pregnancy. In response, the court ordered the formation of a Medical Board on January 29, 2024, to evaluate the advisability of proceeding with the petitioner’s request. However, in a surprising turn of events, it was revealed that the pregnancy had already been terminated before the Medical Board could present its findings.
Also read- CBI Uncovers Forgeries In West Bengal School Recruitment Scandal (lawchakra.in)
Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, presiding over the bench, expressed the need for a thorough explanation from the doctors who proceeded with the termination “in such hot haste” without explicit directions from the court. The judge’s remarks underscore the gravity of the situation, highlighting the urgency with which the procedure was carried out and questioning the existence of any compelling reasons for such rapid action.
The legal representation in this case saw Advocate Goutam Dey advocating for the petitioner, while Advocate Sirsanya Bandopadhyay represented the State. The court’s directive sought to understand the rationale behind the doctors’ decision to proceed with the termination, especially in the absence of a judicial mandate. This incident raises significant concerns about the protocols followed by medical professionals when dealing with sensitive cases that are under judicial review.
Also read- ‘Fighter’ : Legal Notice Over Hrithik And Deepika’s Kiss (lawchakra.in)
The court’s order for a detailed report from the doctors involved is a step towards scrutinizing the circumstances that led to this hasty medical decision. The State has been instructed to ensure compliance with this directive, emphasizing the need for accountability and transparency in such critical matters.
Scheduled for a hearing on February 9, 2024, this case, titled X v The State of West Bengal and others, promises to shed light on the intersection of medical ethics, legal authority, and individual rights. As the court awaits a comprehensive explanation, the legal and medical communities, along with the public, keenly await further developments in this case, which could have far-reaching implications for the governance of medical practices in situations where legal and ethical considerations are intricately intertwined.
Also read- The Madras High Court Consultation On Judicial Vacations (lawchakra.in)
