The Bombay High Court has ruled that a legally adopted child is entitled to take the caste of the adoptive parents and cannot be denied caste-based benefits. The Court directed authorities to issue caste and validity certificates, stressing that denying such rights would leave the child’s future “in limbo.”
MUMBAI: In an important ruling with wide social and legal impact, the Bombay High Court has clearly held that an adopted child has the right to take the caste of his or her adoptive parents. The Court directed the revenue authorities to issue a Special Backward Class (SBC) caste certificate and caste validity certificate to a boy adopted by a Pune-based couple, setting aside earlier orders that had cancelled his caste status.
The Division Bench of Justices M.S. Karnik and S.M. Modak was hearing a petition filed by Gita Dattatray Achari, a resident of Pune. The case related to her adopted son, Om, whose caste certificate had been cancelled despite a legally valid adoption. The judgment brings much-needed clarity on the rights of adopted children, especially when the biological parents are unknown.
According to the facts of the case, in 2014, Achari and her husband adopted an abandoned boy through a lawful process. The adoption was formally approved by the Pune District Court, making Om their legally recognised child.
Three years later, in 2017, the couple applied to the Deputy Collector in Pune seeking a Special Backward Class certificate for Om, requesting that he be included in the Achari caste, which falls under the SBC category in Maharashtra.
Initially, the Deputy Collector accepted their application and granted the caste certificate. However, the situation changed when an anonymous complaint was received questioning the caste status of the adopted child.
Following this complaint, the Sub-Divisional Officer conducted an inquiry into the matter. After the inquiry, the caste certificate issued to Om was cancelled in February 2018.
The decision to cancel the certificate was later upheld by the Caste Scrutiny Committee. Aggrieved by these orders, Achari approached the Bombay High Court, arguing that once an adoption is valid and the biological parents of the child are unknown, the child must legally take the caste of the adoptive parents.
During the hearing, Achari submitted that denying caste status to an adopted child defeats the very purpose of adoption and places the child at a serious disadvantage in society. She argued that adoption is meant to give a child a complete family identity, including social, legal, and constitutional rights.
ALSO READ: Grandparents Can Legally Execute Adoption If Biological Mother Agrees: Madras High Court
On the other hand, the State government opposed the petition. The government lawyer supported the orders passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer and the Caste Scrutiny Committee.
The lawyer argued that the Maharashtra Caste Certificate and Validity laws do not specifically provide for the grant of a caste certificate to an adopted child. On this basis, the State justified the cancellation of the SBC certificate issued to Om.
The High Court, however, strongly rejected the government’s argument. The Bench observed that the authorities had failed to consider the legal consequences of adoption as laid down under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act. The judges made it clear that adoption is not a mere formality but a legal process that creates a full parent-child relationship.
Explaining the legal position, the Bench observed,
“When the process of adoption is completed, the adopted child becomes the legitimate child of the adoptive parents and all rights, privileges and responsibilities are bestowed on him which are attached to that relationship.”
The Court emphasised that caste identity is one such important right that flows from the parent-child relationship created through adoption.
The judges further warned about the serious consequences of denying such recognition to adopted children. They observed,
“If such a right is not bestowed on him, his future will remain in limbo and will be dark.”
The Court noted that without a recognised caste status, an adopted child may face lifelong difficulties in education, employment, and social integration.
The Bench also stressed that the law must be interpreted in a manner that protects the best interests of the child. It held that once adoption is legally completed, the child must be treated in all respects as the biological child of the adoptive parents, including for the purpose of caste classification.
Concluding the matter, the High Court ruled that Om must be recognised as belonging to the Special Backward Class category of his adoptive parents. The Court directed the concerned authorities to issue a caste certificate as well as a caste validity certificate to the adopted child without any further delay.
ALSO READ: Supreme Court: “Legal Recognition of Adoption Must Consider Its Origin Date”
This judgment is being seen as a progressive step towards safeguarding the rights of adopted children and ensuring that they are not left in legal or social uncertainty.
It also sends a strong message to administrative authorities that adoption under law carries full legal consequences, and adopted children cannot be treated differently from biological children when it comes to caste and related constitutional benefits.
Click Here to Read More Reports On Adoption
