The Chhattisgarh High Court delivered a significant judgment on writ petitions, partially granting them and quashing orders that had blacklisted multiple construction companies for three years. The High Court ruled that , Blacklisting Order Must Meet The Standards Of Fairness, Proportionality, And A Properly Reasoned Order
The Delhi High Court ruled Foreign Tax Credit cannot be denied solely for delayed Form 67 filing, directing reconsideration within two months. Real Time Data Services Private Limited challenged FTC denial for AY 2020-21 and subsequent years.
The Delhi High Court held that ex-servicemen who use age relaxation to qualify for recruitment cannot claim unreserved vacancies on merit. It added that candidates taking category concessions cannot simultaneously seek unreserved consideration during shortlisting or selection process.
The Delhi High Court ruled that any increase in the value of assets or shares derived from criminal activities can be treated as “proceeds of crime” under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and attached by the Enforcement Directorate.
Today, On 17th October, Supreme Court quashed criminal cases against SHUATS Vice Chancellor and officials over alleged forced religious conversions, citing legal defects in FIRs and lack of credibility, while interim protection continues for petitioners as serious IPC offences need further proof.
Today, On 9th October, The Supreme Court ruled that couples who started the surrogacy process before January 2022 can proceed even if they exceed the age limits set by the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021.
The Meghalaya High Court has retracted its earlier order that sought Supreme Court approval to continue hearing the case, following the apex court’s directive to transfer all pending stray dog matters directly under its jurisdiction.
Over 1.20 lakh cases are pending in the Delhi High Court, mainly due to judge shortage worsened by recent transfers and retirements. Justice Kathpalia’s bench called the situation “extremely distressing,” as many appeals remain unheard for years.
The Advocates’ Association of Jharkhand High Court has highlighted significant delays in justice delivery, urging the Chief Justice of India for intervention. They claim administrative failures are violating bail rights and constitutional guarantees. Despite repeated grievances, no actions were taken, prompting their appeal for reconstitution of benches and prompt hearings.
Today, On 6th June, Madras High Court denied a plea to re-conduct NEET-UG 2025 for candidates hit by a power outage, as Justice C. Kumarappan noted that such an order would unfairly impact the level playing field for 22 lakh aspirants. The Madras High Court dismissed a series of writ petitions requesting a re-conduct of […]
