The Delhi High Court ruled it cannot direct the government or DMRC to rename metro stations, holding such decisions fall within executive policy.
Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav said courts intervene only if naming is arbitrary or unconstitutional in India.
The Bombay High Court held that factual findings of a Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal cannot be challenged through certiorari merely alleging insufficient evidence. Reappreciation of evidence lies outside writ jurisdiction, which must operate within strict limits under Article 226.
