The Supreme Court criticised AIADMK MP C.V. Shanmugam for casting doubts on the Election Commission and abusing court process. It set aside Madras HC’s order on the “Ungaludan Stalin” scheme and ordered him to pay Rs 10 lakh as costs.
Madras High Court slams Tamil Nadu government, ordering a ban on using names of living leaders or Chief Ministers in government welfare programs to prevent political misuse of public schemes.
Supreme Court dismisses petition calling for economic assessment of freebies and cash benefit schemes. Bench says, “We are not inclined to entertain this petition.”
The West Bengal government has approached the Supreme Court, seeking a revision of its previous order on pending dearness allowance. Sources say the petition also requests clarifications on specific parts of last month’s ruling.
Today, On 25th February, Lawyers are set to go on strike on February 25 in protest against the proposed amendment to the Advocates Act. As part of their demonstration, they plan to surround treasury and registry offices. The legal community strongly opposes the changes, citing concerns over their impact on professional rights. The strike aims to pressure authorities to reconsider the amendment.
Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar defended Chief Minister Siddaramaiah against allegations following the High Court’s approval for an investigation into a site allotment case. He accused the BJP of orchestrating a political conspiracy and asserted that Siddaramaiah is innocent. The state government plans to appeal the High Court’s ruling.
The Supreme Court today issued a warning to the Maharashtra Government, threatening to halt welfare schemes if compensation is not paid to landowners. The court criticized the state’s budgetary allocation for schemes, demanding compensation for illegally taken land. The Chief Secretary may be summoned if steps are not taken by August 28. The court also considered a plea for regulation of political party election manifestos.
Today, On 2nd July, The Bihar government approached the Supreme Court following Patna High Court’s ruling that invalidated a law increasing reservations for SC/STs and backward classes to 65% in 2023, reducing the open merit category to 35%. The High Court declared the amendment unconstitutional, citing infringement on equal opportunity. This decision is now contested before the Supreme Court.
