Today, On 7th November, Supreme Court declined to interfere in the demolition of Ujjain’s 200-year-old Takiya Mosque, observing that the action was taken under a statutory framework and that the government had already provided due compensation before the demolition.
In a powerful judgment on the Munambam Waqf land dispute, the Kerala High Court warned that arbitrary waqf declarations could one day label even national monuments like the Taj Mahal or the Court’s own building as waqf property, threatening constitutional rights.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that practicing religion is not dependent on any particular place while dismissing a plea to reconstruct the 200-year-old Takiya Masjid in Ujjain, demolished for Mahakal Lok expansion. The court held that land acquisition does not infringe Articles 25 and 26 rights.
Kerala High Court, Justices SA Dharmadhikari and Syam Kumar VM, upheld the State Government’s decision to form an inquiry commission to probe the Munambam Waqf land dispute, bringing major relief and renewed hope to nearly 600 evicted families. The Kerala High Court set-aside a previous ruling made by a single judge, which had cancelled the […]
AIMPLB expressed disappointment over the Supreme Court’s partial stay on the Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025, calling the order “incomplete and unsatisfactory.” Nationwide protests, including a massive Ramlila Maidan rally on November 16, are planned to demand full repeal.
Today, On 15th September, The Supreme Court in the Waqf Amendment Act case placed on record its appreciation for counsels on all sides, praising their assistance, arguments and submissions while recognising the efforts of both petitioners’ and respondents’ senior counsel teams.
Today, On 15th September, Supreme Court imposes partial stay on the Waqf Amendment Act. The 5-year Islam practice clause is put on hold, while the registration requirement remains unaffected, affecting three key provisions under the 2025 amendment
Today, On 15th September, The Supreme Court, in an interim order by CJI BR Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih, said no case was made to stay the entire Waqf Amendment Act, 2025, but stayed two provisions pending resolution of validity challenges.
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal criticized the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, claiming it aims to control waqf properties via executive processes rather than judicial ones. He argued the law jeopardizes religious practices by enabling the government to declare waqf properties void, thus challenging constitutional protections and garnering wide opposition in the Supreme Court.
Today, On 29th April, The Delhi High Court has asked responses from the Delhi Police and Waqf Board over the alleged illegal sale of a Waqf property by a tenant. A related petition seeking legal action was also filed before the court.
