Today, On 2nd may, The Supreme Court has refused to hear a fresh petition challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, stating the issue had already been addressed earlier, and no new grounds were presented to reopen the case.
The Centre informed the Supreme Court that the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 enhances transparency in managing waqf properties without disrupting Muslim religious practices. The law aligns with constitutional values and does not infringe on fundamental rights. The government urged dismissal of petitions challenging its legality, asserting its constitutionality and public interest benefits.
Asaduddin Owaisi responded to judicial overreach allegations by saying the Supreme Court must examine whether a law violates fundamental rights, freedoms, or the basic structure of the Constitution. He added that such scrutiny is a constitutional responsibility.
Today, On 17th April, The Centre informed the Supreme Court that it will not appoint non-Muslims to Waqf boards and will de-notify existing Waqfs for the time being. This statement came during the ongoing challenge to the Waqf Amendment Act, as the government assured no changes will occur until further directions from the court.
Today, On 17th April, The Centre assured the Supreme Court that there will be “no Waqf appointments, no change in status until the next hearing,” and confirmed that no non-Muslims would be appointed to Waqf boards for now.
Today, On 16th April, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, arguing before the Supreme Court, strongly opposed the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. He said allowing a state-appointed Collector to decide if a property is waqf makes the officer a “judge in his own cause”, which is unconstitutional.
Today, On 16th April, During the Waqf Amendment Act hearing, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta’s remark” Then this bench also cannot hear the case” created a sharp response from the Supreme Court, which questioned the inclusion of non-Muslims in Waqf bodies and pressed the Centre for clarity.
Today, On 16th April, The Supreme Court, while examining the Waqf Amendment Act, remarked that undoing the concept of ‘waqf by user’ would create huge problems. The Court highlighted the serious impact but did not grant interim relief.
Today, On 16th April, Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna clarified during the hearing that the Supreme Court is “not considering stay (of the Act)” at this stage. The bench will first examine the legal and constitutional issues before deciding on any interim relief.
The Uttarakhand Waqf Board has requested the Supreme Court to join a case challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, supporting the law’s constitutional validity. The Board sees itself as a vital participant due to its role in managing Waqf properties, addressing concerns about property genuineness and illegal encroachments while seeking to assist the court.
