The Supreme Court will hear petitions on December 1 seeking more time for mandatory registration of all Waqf properties on the UMEED portal. The pleas challenge the strict deadline under the amended Waqf Act, 2025, fearing risk to ‘waqf by user’ properties.
Today, On 3rd November, The Supreme Court agreed to hear a plea filed by AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi seeking more time for the registration of Waqf properties on the Centre’s UMEED portal. CJI B R Gavai assured, “We will give a date.”
The Supreme Court has agreed to list AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi’s plea seeking more time to register waqf properties on the UMEED portal. Advocate Nizam Pasha poetically argued that most of the allotted time was lost in waiting for the court’s decision.
AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi reacted sharply to the Supreme Court’s order on the Waqf Amendment Act, saying, “Devil will be in the details,” and termed the decision as not good for safeguarding Waqf properties.
Union Minister Kiren Rijiju has launched the UMEED portal to enhance transparency and management of waqf properties in India. The platform ensures real-time data access and requires property registration within six months. It features a three-tier verification system, an online grievance redressal mechanism, and aims to benefit marginalized communities.
BJP leader and lawyer Ashwini Upadhyay has approached the Supreme Court challenging key provisions of the Waqf Amendment Act, raising the question, “Do these changes violate equality & justice?” The plea seeks a review of constitutional validity.
Today, On 21st May, The Central government told the Supreme Court that waqf boards handle secular duties, so adding non-Muslims won’t impact their work. It also said Hindu trusts differ, as they don’t allow non-Hindus as members.
Today, On 20th May, Centre Requests Supreme Court to Limit Hearing Scope to Three Specific Issues only while considering interim orders in the ongoing Waqf Amendment Act challenge.
In the Supreme Court, Senior Advocates Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Singhvi questioned the new Waqf law, asking, “Who asks for proof of religion?” while arguing that the law unfairly targets religious endowments.
Petitioners are contesting the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 in the Supreme Court, arguing it allows government seizure of waqf properties through non-judicial means, compromising their religious status. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal claims the amendment undermines past protections and may lead to loss of waqf status if not registered, raising significant legal concerns.
