The Supreme Court will hear petitions on December 1 seeking more time for mandatory registration of all Waqf properties on the UMEED portal. The pleas challenge the strict deadline under the amended Waqf Act, 2025, fearing risk to ‘waqf by user’ properties.
Today, On 3rd November, The Supreme Court agreed to hear a plea filed by AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi seeking more time for the registration of Waqf properties on the Centre’s UMEED portal. CJI B R Gavai assured, “We will give a date.”
The Supreme Court has agreed to list AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi’s plea seeking more time to register waqf properties on the UMEED portal. Advocate Nizam Pasha poetically argued that most of the allotted time was lost in waiting for the court’s decision.
The Supreme Court of India has reserved its verdict on petitions challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, after three days of hearings. Petitioners argue the Act’s changes, including removing ‘waqf by user,’ discriminate against Muslims and affect their religious management rights. The government defends the amendments as necessary to prevent misuse.
The Supreme Court heard petitions challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, led by advocates for petitioners claiming it unfairly targets Muslims with stringent property registration rules not imposed on other religions. Key concerns include potential loss of waqf status, implications for community rights, and calls for interim relief amidst government’s defense of the law.
The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, passed by the Indian Parliament, alters the 1995 Waqf Act, prompting widespread debate and legal challenges. Notable changes include expanded government control and inclusion of non-Muslims in Waqf Boards, raising concerns about religious autonomy. The Supreme Court is currently reviewing its constitutional validity amidst ongoing hearings.
The Supreme Court of India will hear petitions challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, on May 5. Critics question its constitutional validity, especially amid disputes over data and provisions. The Central Government supports the law’s implementation, arguing against delays, while various political and civil groups oppose it and seek legal intervention.
The Supreme Court on Thursday took up petitions contesting the Waqf Amendment Act, 2025, focusing on the contentious removal of the long-recognized concept of ‘waqf by user’.
The Supreme Court of India is reviewing petitions against the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, which challenges the de-notification of properties declared as waqf. The court emphasized the importance of preserving existing waqf properties and expressed concerns over controversial provisions in the Amendment Act, indicating a possible interim order to address these issues.
Today, On 16th April, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, arguing before the Supreme Court, strongly opposed the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. He said allowing a state-appointed Collector to decide if a property is waqf makes the officer a “judge in his own cause”, which is unconstitutional.
