Today, On 1st November, The Supreme Court heard pleas seeking more time to complete mandatory Waqf registration on the UMEED Portal, with petitioners citing glitches and missing historical records. The Bench said those unable to meet the six-month deadline must individually approach the Tribunal for extension.
The Union Ministry of Minority Affairs has drafted rules to implement the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, awaiting approval from the Union Law Ministry within 15-20 days. The act introduces significant changes to waqf property management in India, facing legal challenges and criticism from various groups. Training initiatives for implementing the rules have commenced.
The All India Muslim Personal Law Board plans to file a contempt plea in the Supreme Court against the government’s launch of the Waqf Umeed Portal, deeming it illegal as the Waqf Amendment Act, 2025 is under judicial review. They argue it disrespects court authority and disrupts religious property management.
The Supreme Court heard petitions challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, led by advocates for petitioners claiming it unfairly targets Muslims with stringent property registration rules not imposed on other religions. Key concerns include potential loss of waqf status, implications for community rights, and calls for interim relief amidst government’s defense of the law.
Petitioners are contesting the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 in the Supreme Court, arguing it allows government seizure of waqf properties through non-judicial means, compromising their religious status. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal claims the amendment undermines past protections and may lead to loss of waqf status if not registered, raising significant legal concerns.
The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, passed by the Indian Parliament, alters the 1995 Waqf Act, prompting widespread debate and legal challenges. Notable changes include expanded government control and inclusion of non-Muslims in Waqf Boards, raising concerns about religious autonomy. The Supreme Court is currently reviewing its constitutional validity amidst ongoing hearings.
CJI Sanjiv Khanna’s brief six-month tenure was marked by significant reforms in judicial processes and transparency, addressing backlog issues and improving case listings. He maintained accountability within the judiciary and managed sensitive cases with composure. His leadership left the Supreme Court more stable and open, continuing the legacy of his predecessor.