A contempt petition in the Supreme Court alleges that Delhi Metro station closures and train cancellations ahead of the October 10 protest violate the Court’s October 9 order. The allegations are untested.
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta exchanged sharp remarks in the Supreme Court during the hearing on curbs on Delhi trains, Metro and internet ahead of the October 10 protest. The contentions are untested.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the Supreme Court that Delhi has not been shut down and that a complete stoppage may be proportionate depending on circumstances. The submissions are untested.
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant asked why the plea against Delhi train, Metro and internet curbs was not taken to the Delhi High Court. The Court expressed no view on the merits.
The microphones went off during the Supreme Court hearing on curbs on Delhi trains, Metro and internet ahead of the October 10 protest, prompting Senior Advocates Kapil Sibal and Gopal Sankaranarayanan to flag it. The CJI responded in the affirmative.
The Supreme Court has recorded that there shall be no complete prohibition on movement of metro and trains in Delhi ahead of the October 10 protests, after the Solicitor General agreed to ask authorities to reconsider. The merits of the protest and the curbs were not decided.
The Lawyers’ Association for Constitution has constituted a five-member commission of former judges chaired by Justice Madan B. Lokur to examine the constitutional validity, methodology and impact of the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls, with public hearings planned and a report targeted for December 2026.
Advocate Vrinda Grover has said that “Free Umar Khalid” is a valid statement for anyone who understands the Constitution and believes in Indian democracy, arguing that the student activist has spent six years in pre-trial custody under the UAPA in the 2020 Delhi riots case, and pointing to a conflict between Supreme Court benches on […]
The Centre told the Delhi High Court that X failed to act despite “actual knowledge” of controversial tweets by Rana Ayyub. It warned that this inaction could lead to loss of safe harbour protection under IT laws.
A Delhi court has set aside a gag order that had restrained four journalists from publishing stories against Adani Enterprises. The court ruled that the earlier order was unsustainable as the journalists were not given a fair hearing.
