The Allahabad High Court dismissed a PIL challenging NBEMS’s decision to lower NEET-PG 2025 cut-off marks for SC/ST/OBC candidates, including allowing counselling at minus 40 marks. The Court noted that the issue is a policy decision, already rejected by the Delhi High Court and pending before the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court resumed hearing on ADR’s plea challenging Bihar’s Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls, amid concerns over voter exclusion and fairness. The Election Commission defended the exercise, arguing that Article 326 and election laws fully empower it to revise rolls to protect electoral integrity.
Today, On 10th July, Supreme Court hears pleas challenging Bihar’s voter list revision, calling the matter crucial to the “Right to Vote” and stating it “goes to the root of democracy” amid concerns over EC’s Special Intensive Revision.
Today, On 10th July, the Supreme Court will hear petitions challenging the Election Commission’s revision of Bihar’s electoral rolls. The move, coming before upcoming elections, has triggered legal and political concerns across the state.
The Supreme Court will hear on July 10 the petitions challenging the EC’s Special Revision of Bihar’s voter list. However, the Court has refused to pause the ongoing revision process for now.
Tejashwi Yadav’s RJD has moved the Supreme Court challenging the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision of Bihar’s voter list. Kapil Sibal, representing RJD, has urged for an urgent hearing ahead of the upcoming elections.
