“Why Don’t You Feed Them at Home?” — Supreme Court Slams Petitioner in Stray Dog Feeding Case

The Supreme Court questioned a plea on feeding stray dogs, asking, “Why don’t you feed them in your house?” The court stressed public safety while tagging the matter with a similar pending plea. New Delhi: Today, on July 15, the Supreme Court of India, during a hearing on a plea related to the feeding of […]

SIMI Ban | Supreme Court Upholds Tribunal’s Order Confirming 5-Year Ban Extension, Dismisses Challenge

Today, On 14th July, The Supreme Court has dismissed a plea challenging the tribunal’s decision to extend the ban on SIMI, upholding the 5-year prohibition imposed by the Centre under UAPA based on continued threats to national security and public order.

Whether Alimony Can be Granted If Marriage is Declared Void? Supreme Court To Decide

The Supreme Court is set to review whether alimony can be awarded when a marriage is declared void under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Conflicting judgments have led to this matter being referred to a larger bench by a Division Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and PB Varale. The issue will be resolved by a three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court.

1990 Custodial Death Case|| SC Issues Notice to Gujarat Govt on Former IPS Officer Sanjiv Bhatt’s Appeal Against Life Sentence

The Supreme Court has today issued a notice to the Gujarat Government regarding former police officer Sanjiv Bhatt’s appeal against his conviction and life sentence in a 1990 custodial death case. Bhatt, along with other officers, was found guilty of custodial torture following communal riots. The case will be heard alongside related appeals.

After SC’s Ruling on “Creamy Layer” Within SC/ST Reservations; BJP SC/ST MPs Urge PM Modi to Challenge the Decision

BJP SC/ST MPs met with PM Modi to discuss the Supreme Court’s decision on “creamy layer” in SC/ST reservations, requesting non-enforcement. PM Modi assured support for their position. The Court’s ruling allows sub-classification of SCs and STs for reservation benefits, with six justices in favor and one dissenting. This ruling overruled the earlier EV Chinnaiah decision.

SC: Article 20(1) Of Constitution Doesn’t Bar Retrospective Application of Procedural Changes in Criminal Trial

Supreme Court Affirms: Article 20(1) Doesn’t Restrict Retrospective Application of Procedural Changes in Criminal Trials In a pivotal judgment, the Supreme Court has clarified that procedural changes in criminal trials, introduced after an offence is committed, are not barred from retrospective application by Article 20(1) of the Constitution. This article prohibits the imposition of ex […]