Supreme Court Adjourns Punjab’s Plea Against High Court Order For CBI Probe Linked To CM’s Office

The Supreme Court has adjourned the State of Punjab’s challenge to the High Court order directing a CBI probe linked to the Chief Minister’s office, after the file reached one of the judges late. New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday adjourned the plea of the State of Punjab against the Punjab and Haryana High […]

Supreme Court: Punjab Challenges High Court Order For CBI Probe Into Allegations Linked To CM’s Office

The State of Punjab has moved the Supreme Court against the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s direction to the CBI to register a case on the Enforcement Directorate’s allegations concerning the OSD to the Chief Minister, calling the plea politically motivated.

Punjab And Haryana HC Flags Malice In Demolition Against PIL Petitioner, Orders CBI Probe

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has said the haste with which GMADA moved to demolish the farm stay of a PIL petitioner, soon after he filed the petition, cannot be brushed aside, as it handed the investigation of Enforcement Directorate material against senior officials to the CBI. Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana High Court […]

Delhi High Court Slams ED For “Colourable Exercise Of Power”, Quashes PMLA Money Laundering Case.

The Delhi High Court quashed ED money-laundering proceedings against the Aristo Group, holding a PMLA case cannot survive once the predicate offence is closed, and calling the ED’s revival attempt a colourable exercise of power. New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has quashed the Enforcement Directorate’s money-laundering proceedings against the family and management of the […]

Review of Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Judgement| SC Schedules to Hear PMLA Pleas, Today (March 6)

Today, On 6th March, The Supreme Court scheduled hearings for pleas challenging the Vijay Madanlal Choudhary judgment Today. This ruling upheld key provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), granting extensive powers to the Enforcement Directorate (ED). Several petitioners argue that the verdict violates constitutional rights and needs reconsideration.