The Supreme Court has questioned the absence of the NOTA option in uncontested elections, calling it an issue “worth examining,” while the Centre dismissed it as an “academic” matter. The case stems from a PIL challenging Section 53(2) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.
Former Supreme Court judge Sanjay Kishan Kaul has suggested that the Centre should enact a new law if it is dissatisfied with the striking down of the NJAC Act. He expressed concern over the executive delaying collegium recommendations for judicial appointments. Kaul emphasized the need for timely action to ensure a smooth appointment process. His remarks have reignited discussions on judicial reforms in India.
During a discussion on CJI DY Chandrachud’s legacy, retired Justice RC Chavan criticized his concern for public perception, deeming it inappropriate for a judge. While some praised Chandrachud’s judgment style, others noted limited reforms and urged judges to prioritize impartiality over legacy. Chavan also raised concerns about hastily introduced livestreaming of court proceedings.
Former Madras High Court judge Justice PN Prakash criticized the appointment of public prosecutors, pointing out that their political affiliations undermine the legal system. He also highlighted issues of perjury, civil suits, and language barriers faced by migrant workers in criminal cases. The discussion also covered the impact of civil disputes on criminal cases and the challenges faced by magistrates.