Sheer Wastage of Judicial Time: Delhi High Court Slams Lawyers for Attending Virtual Hearings from Moving Cars

The Delhi High Court strongly criticised lawyers for joining virtual court hearings from moving cars, observing that such conduct causes inconvenience, wastes precious judicial time, and hampers access to justice, defeating the purpose of using technology in courts.

Bombay High Court on Shiv Sena Leader: Restrained by Temporary Order from Making Defamatory or Communal Remarks Against Slum Developer

The Bombay High Court issued a temporary injunction restraining a Shiv Sena leader from making defamatory, slanderous, libelous or communal remarks against a slum developer, stressing that such statements cannot be permitted under law during the dispute.

Somnath Bharti Can’t Represent Wife in Defamation Case, Cites Conflict: Nirmala Sitharaman Tells Delhi Court

Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman argues that AAP leader Somnath Bharti cannot represent his wife, Lipika Mitra, in her defamation complaint against her. The court acknowledges the conflict of interest due to Bharti’s direct involvement, with further hearings scheduled for July 16, 2025, as Mitra accuses Sitharaman of damaging Bharti’s reputation.

Supreme Court Suggests Mandatory Mention of AIBE in Vakalatnama for Lawyers Enrolled After 2010

The Supreme Court of India proposed that the Bar Council of India mandate attorneys enrolled post-2010 to include their All India Bar Examination status in their vakalatnama. This aims to enhance transparency and regulatory compliance, linking non-compliance to misconduct under the Advocates Act. The court also questioned the enrolment fee structure.

Delhi Court Refers Lawyer to Bar Council and High Court Over ‘Unprofessional’ Conduct in 2020 Riots Case

A Delhi court has referred lawyer Anil Kumar Goswami to the Delhi High Court and Bar Council for his unprofessional conduct during a hearing related to the 2020 Northeast Delhi riots. The judge was offended by Goswami’s disrespectful remarks and lack of preparation, raising concerns about his professionalism and intentions in court.

Vadodara Tragedy || “Vakalatnama Submitted & Accused Sent to Judicial Custody”: Lawyer of Accident Victim

A Vakalatnama has been filed against the accused in the Vadodara accident case. Following legal proceedings, the accused has been sent to judicial custody. The victim’s lawyer confirmed this development. Further legal actions are expected in the case.

“Understanding Advocates-on-Record: Role, Responsibilities, and Authority in the Supreme Court”

An Advocate-on-Record (AoR) is a specialized lawyer authorized to represent clients in the Supreme Court of India, handling case filings, drafting petitions, and ensuring compliance with court procedures. To qualify, AoRs must pass a specialized exam after training. Their role is crucial for effective legal representation and maintaining court integrity.

Strange Case of ‘Impersonation’: Ghost Plea to Reopen Rape case, Involved to Businessman Nitish Katara Murder| SC Three-Judge Bench to Hear Case Today

Three-judge bench led by Justice Sanjiv Khanna to hear rare case of judicial fraud involving a rape complaint. Alleged impersonator claims innocence, raising questions about document authenticity. Case linked to high-profile murder and political ties. Supreme Court demands new affidavits and emphasizes the need to verify legal documents. Critical concerns about judicial integrity highlighted.

Vakalatnama Forgery | Supreme Court Dismisses Plea by Two Gujarat Lawyers Against Probe

The Supreme Court Today (April 15th) dismissed a plea moved by two lawyers (petitioners) challenging a Gujarat High Court order to initiate a probe against them on suspicions that they forged a vakalatnama.