Former Chief Justice of India UU Lalit, during a Supreme Court Bar Association lecture on “BNS 2023 and IPC 1860: Continuity, Change and Challenges,” said male victims remain remediless, as BNS missed the chance to make rape laws gender neutral. Former Chief Justice of India UU Lalit delivered a lecture organized by the Supreme Court […]
Senior advocate Dushyant Dave calls for a minimum 3-year term for Chief Justices, citing short tenures hinder judicial impact. His remarks follow CJI Gavai’s 6-month term.
CJI BR Gavai strongly addressed the belief that the Supreme Court is controlled only by the Chief Justice, emphasizing collective decision-making and judicial balance. He highlighted key reforms, personal values, and transparency in appointments and pensions.
Former CJI UU Lalit expressed legal concerns regarding the ‘One Nation One Election’ Bill before a Joint Parliamentary Committee. He advised staggering elections to avoid constitutional challenges during implementation.
The demand for a nationwide caste census in India, led by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, is generating political controversy. While Gandhi argues it will address inequities by providing essential demographic data, BJP leaders criticize it as a “divisive” tactic. Former CJI U.U. Lalit supports the census, emphasizing its potential to enhance equitable policymaking.
Former Chief Justice UU Lalit praised the proposal for a parliamentary debate on the Constitution, emphasizing its importance for assessing India’s adherence to constitutional goals. He noted the effectiveness of judicial interpretations on fundamental rights, especially regarding education. While acknowledging the need for amendments, Lalit highlighted the Constitution’s role in promoting inclusivity and governance improvements.
Former Chief Justice of India UU Lalit praised the new criminal laws for addressing mob lynching and welcomed changes related to hit-and-run cases. He supported the 15-day police custody rule and hailed the abolition of the colonial-era sedition law. Lalit compared the new laws to previous anti-terrorism legislation and emphasized the need for a democratic society.
The Rajasthan High Court dismissed a PIL seeking live streaming of court proceedings, citing the availability of video conferencing facilities. The division bench rejected the plea, emphasizing the existing provision of video conferencing. While some other high courts have embraced live streaming, the Rajasthan High Court will continue providing video conferencing facilities.
