The Supreme Court set aside the Calcutta High Court’s demolition order and allowed a housing project near Visva-Bharati University, holding that “khoai” is not a recognised land category under West Bengal law. The Court ruled that in the absence of fraud or major illegality, demolition is a harsh measure and imposed a Rs 1 lakh cost on PIL petitioners.
The Supreme Court ruled that Mumbai land acquisition under the Slum Act cannot proceed until the owner’s “preferential right to develop” is extinguished. The Court rejected Jyoti Builders’ plea, upheld the new owner’s rights, and ordered the land to remain a Recreational Ground.
The Calcutta High Court ordered the demolition of a tower at Elita Garden Vista, stressing that there is no alternative when additional structures are built without the consent of flat owners and beyond the sanctioned plan.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court stayed the state’s 2025 land pooling policy, flagging missing impact studies, no timelines, and lack of rehabilitation plans. The court said it was “notified in haste” without addressing key concerns.
Despite a High Court stay order, the DDA demolished around 200 jhuggis in Delhi’s Jailorwala Bagh area. One affected youth said, “They still came and demolished my home,” as families were left homeless and helpless.
The Supreme Court will hear in July a petition challenging the proposed demolition of alleged illegal structures in Okhla village. The plea raises concerns over residents’ rights and the legality of the demolition drive.
Today, On 28th May, The Supreme Court described the Delhi Ridge tree-cutting issue as “a case of institutional missteps and administrative overreach,” while letting the Delhi LG and DDA off the hook in the contempt case, citing broader public welfare considerations.
During a Supreme Court hearing on the Gateway of India jetty project, a debate arose about the meanings of ‘Aamchi Mumbai’ and ‘Tyanchi Mumbai.’ The Chief Justice explained the difference, highlighting local identity and belonging in Mumbai.
The Union Budget allocated Rs.123.75 crore for the expansion of the Supreme Court building. According to the budget speech, this funding is designated for a central sector project aimed at the court’s infrastructure development. The expansion is expected to enhance facilities and efficiency. This move highlights the government’s focus on judicial infrastructure.
Today, On 15th January, the Supreme Court expressed concerns about spending money on cycle tracks instead of focusing on essential services. During a recent hearing, the court questioned whether projects like cycle tracks should be given more importance than basic needs like healthcare, education, and public welfare. This has started a debate about the government’s spending priorities. The court stressed the need for a balanced approach, prioritizing the welfare of citizens.
