The Supreme Court will hear next week a petition challenging the Uttar Pradesh ordinance taking over Banke Bihari Temple’s management. “How many temples taken over by law?” the bench asked while seeking data on similar cases nationwide.
The Supreme Court criticized the Uttar Pradesh government for interfering in a private dispute over the management of the Shri Banke Bihari temple in Vrindavan. The Court warned such interference undermines the rule of law, emphasizing the government should not involve itself in private legal matters. The Court firmly rejected the government’s attempts to hijack the case.
The Supreme Court of India has authorized the Uttar Pradesh government to utilize funds from the Shri Banke Bihari Temple to acquire 5 acres of land for developing facilities to manage the high influx of devotees. This decision overturns a previous High Court ruling, reflecting the urgent need for improved infrastructure at the temple.
New Delhi, Feb 17: The Uttar Pradesh government has informed the Supreme Court that it is making changes to state laws to remove the practice of appointing the wives and family members of bureaucrats as ex-officio members in cooperative societies and trusts. The government is also working on model rules to regulate these entities, especially those receiving financial aid from the state.
The UP Government Today (Dec 12) informed the Supreme Court that it might revisit existing criminal cases where its stringent anti-gangsters law was invoked and new guidelines were being formulated on how to apply its provisions. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan told additional solicitor general K M Nataraj, representing the government, that some of the provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act appeared to be “draconian”.
Today, On 14th November, the Supreme Court requested a response from the Uttar Pradesh government regarding a petition by choreographer Remo D’Souza, who seeks to quash a 2016 cheating case against him. The case, linked to a failed investment promise, highlights critical legal issues that may impact future entertainment industry regulations.
Today, On 6th November, the Supreme Court criticized Uttar Pradesh for unlawfully demolishing a house in 2019, ordering Rs 25 lakh in compensation to the homeowner. The court emphasized the need for lawful procedures in property demolition and directed an investigation into the involved officials, reinforcing citizens’ rights against arbitrary state actions.
![[Bahraich Violence] "Is State Misunderstood Intent of Previous Order on Demolition Notices?": Allahabad HC Slams UP Govt. For not Filing Response](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-2-6.png?resize=447%2C251&ssl=1)
Today, On 23rd October, the Allahabad High Court criticized the Uttar Pradesh government for not responding to a case regarding demolitions in Bahraich. The court expressed frustration over delays and instructed the state to provide detailed information about the road’s category. Affected residents were given 15 days to respond to demolition notices.