The Supreme Court has postponed the hearing on the dispute over appointment of vice-chancellors in West Bengal’s state-aided universities to January. The adjournment came after the Attorney General informed the court that positive developments have taken place.
The Supreme Court sharply criticised the Kerala Governor for not taking a decision on the Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia report concerning Vice Chancellor appointments in two state universities. The Bench said the Governor cannot sit on the recommendations and must act without further delay.
Today, On 19th September, The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL seeking changes in the medical syllabus, with CJI BR Gavai firmly stating, “This is not our work. We cannot decide what syllabus should or shouldn’t be. Approach the university or government.”
Kerala HC criticises ongoing tussle between VC and Registrar over suspension linked to Bharat Mata portrait event. Court seeks response as Registrar alleges abuse of power by Vice-Chancellor.
The Tamil Nadu government has approached the Supreme Court challenging the Madras High Court’s May 21 order that stayed nine state laws from 2020 related to appointing Vice-Chancellors in universities, calling it unconstitutional interference.
A PIL in the Madras High Court challenges 12 Tamil Nadu laws that transfer Vice-Chancellor appointment powers from the Governor to the State. The petitioner claims these laws violate UGC norms and constitutional regulations. The court will review the petition on May 21, 2025, considering the validity and potential interim orders.
NEW DELHI: On Friday (8th Feb): The Supreme Court of India has raised concerns over a “deadlock” caused by Tamil Nadu Governor R N Ravi not taking a decision on bills passed by the legislative assembly. The court questioned how the state government could function if the Governor neither approved nor communicated his reasons for withholding assent.
The Delhi High Court ruled that the appointment of Prof Eqbal Hussain as officiating Vice-Chancellor of Jamia Millia Islamia was legally untenable. The court directed immediate appointment of an eligible person as officiating VC and initiation of the process for selecting a permanent VC within specified timeframes. This decision emphasizes adherence to statutory guidelines in administrative appointments.
