![[Breaking] Delhi HC's Justice Amit Sharma Recuses from Umar Khalid's Bail Plea in Delhi Riots Case; Will Hear on July 24](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/14khalid.jpeg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Justice Amit Sharma today of the Delhi High Court has recused himself from hearing Umar Khalid’s bail plea in the Delhi riots conspiracy case. The case will be heard again on July 24, along with bail appeals from other co-accused. Umar Khalid, a former JNU scholar, faces multiple charges including criminal conspiracy and unlawful assembly under the UAPA. His continued incarceration has sparked debate and drawn attention from supporters and human rights advocates.
Former JNU scholar Umar Khalid has filed a new bail appeal in the Delhi riots conspiracy case, with the Delhi High Court set to hear the case on July 22. Khalid, arrested in September 2020, faces serious charges under the UAPA and has been in custody since. This marks his second attempt for bail, following previous rejections. The upcoming hearing is crucial in his legal journey.
Today, 13th May, Umar Khalid’s bail plea, filed under UAPA in the Delhi riots case, is pending a decision from the Karkardooma Court. The court reserved the order after arguments from both sides. Khalid’s defense emphasizes lack of substantial evidence and bias in media trial. The Delhi Police, opposing the bail, cited his alleged attempts to influence bail hearings through social media.
Today, 24th April,Umar Khalid’s lawyer argued in court that the allegations against him do not amount to a terrorism offense, emphasizing the lack of evidence. The defense also highlighted media scrutiny and called for a fair legal process. Khalid’s bail request is under consideration, with the next hearing scheduled for May 7. The lawyer cited inconsistencies in the prosecution’s case and urged the court to assess the evidence critically.
Today, 10th April, The ongoing legal proceedings regarding Umar Khalid’s bail hearings in Delhi highlight the influence of social media narratives on judicial processes. The Delhi Police’s statement in court revealed Khalid’s alleged manipulation of online content to sway bail decisions. Legal arguments also addressed the prosecution’s reliance on evidence and the evolving interpretation of prima facie evidence in similar cases.
On Tuesday (9th April): The Delhi Police opposed Umar Khalid’s bail plea, alleging he spread false information on social media and incited violence during the 2020 Delhi riots. They presented evidence of his communication with various individuals to manipulate the narrative. Khalid’s request for bail hinged on lack of evidence against him, with the court set to decide on the matter.
Today(14th March), The Karkardooma District Court in Delhi grants the Delhi Police extra time to respond to Umar Khalid’s bail plea in the Delhi riots case. Khalid, in custody since September 2020, anticipates further arguments on March 21, 2024. The court’s decision follows a request for more time due to changes in the investigative team. Umar Khalid’s counsel also requested his visit to Jamia for a root canal treatment.
![[BREAKING] Delhi Riots 2020 Conspiracy Case: Delhi High Court Seeks Police Reply to Umar Khalid's Bail Plea](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/1666016562_1619124028_khalid.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Umar Khalid, the former JNU student leader, has filed for bail in the Delhi riots case, making his second attempt for release. Facing charges under UAPA and IPC for his alleged role in orchestrating the 2020 riots, he awaits the Delhi Police’s response as the trial court sets the next hearing for March 11, 2024.
New Delhi, Feb 22 Delhi Court has once again denied bail to Tasleem Ahmed, who is implicated in the 2020 North-East Delhi riots under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA). This decision underscores the complexities of legal proceedings in cases involving allegations of a larger conspiracy. Also Read- Delhi Court Grants Bail To […]
Student activist Umar Khalid, on Wednesday detained by Delhi Police since September 13, 2020, opted to retract his bail petition and a writ challenging the constitutional validity of certain UAPA provisions, notably Section 43D, which imposes strict bail conditions. The Supreme Court, on Thursday, made a significant decision regarding the contentious Unlawful Activities Prevention Act […]