“Once Signed, It Stands”: Supreme Court Says Bail Order Can’t Be Undone Over ‘Allowed’ Typo

The Supreme Court of India ruled that once a bail order is signed, it cannot be recalled or reversed due to a staff member’s typing mistake. Invoking Section 362 CrPC, the Court restored anticipatory bail, holding that changing “allowed” to “rejected” amounts to an illegal review, not a clerical correction.

Typographical Error is No Defence, Complaint Invalid if Demand Notice Shows Wrong Cheque Amount: Supreme Court

Supreme Court rules that a typographical error is no defence; cheque bounce complaint is invalid if the demand notice shows a wrong cheque amount, clarifying legal procedures and liabilities.

Waqf Amendment Act Order| Supreme Court To Correct Typographical Error: Paragraph 178 Referenced an Incorrect Section

The Supreme Court said it will correct a typographical mistake in its judgment on the Waqf Amendment Act order. It noted that “Paragraph 178 referenced an incorrect section,” after advocate Sneha Kalita flagged the error before the bench.