The Union Ministry of Minority Affairs has drafted rules to implement the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, awaiting approval from the Union Law Ministry within 15-20 days. The act introduces significant changes to waqf property management in India, facing legal challenges and criticism from various groups. Training initiatives for implementing the rules have commenced.
Top Indian legal experts emphasize the need for arbitrators to act cautiously and fairly when fraud is suspected, even if not formally raised. Discussions highlighted the importance of procedural steps to balance efficiency with due process. The integrity of arbitration is crucial, especially in cases involving significant public funds and potential collusion.
The Supreme Court encountered difficulties in understanding a judgment by retired Justice Sureshwar Thakur due to its complex language, notably regarding the unconstitutionality of Section 3G of the National Highways Act. The confusion led to a humorous exchange among justices, prompting a stay of the judgment to allow further review.
On May 28, 2025, the Supreme Court of India upheld the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s directives for constructing a verandah and using green paver blocks at the Chandigarh Capitol Complex, emphasizing sustainable development. This decision addressed parking issues while ensuring preservation of the UNESCO World Heritage site’s integrity and ecological balance.
L&T has accused MMRDA of unfair practices in a Rs 6,000 crore infrastructure tender, leading to a Supreme Court hearing set for May 29 after Bombay HC dismissed L&T’s petitions. The Supreme Court highlighted the need for transparency regarding public funds and questioned fairness in the tender process, emphasizing L&T’s right to challenge its bid rejection.
The Supreme Court directed the Assam Human Rights Commission to investigate allegations of fake police encounters in Assam, following a Public Interest Litigation. The court stressed adherence to procedural safeguards and the necessity of impartial investigations while acknowledging the serious nature of the accusations. The commission is tasked with ensuring affected families can voice their concerns.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta came forward to help a student who couldn’t afford her final semester fee at Hofstra University, New York, and told the Court, “I will pay her entire fee.”
NEW DELHI: 23rd May: The Delhi High Court has reserved its judgment on a case filed by Turkish company Celebi Airport Services India Pvt Ltd, which challenged the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security’s (BCAS) decision to cancel its security clearance. The clearance was withdrawn citing “national security” reasons. The matter was heard by Justice Sachin Datta, who reserved the order after listening to detailed arguments from both sides on Friday. The next hearing is scheduled for May 24, according to a report by Reuters.
The Supreme Court examined the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, comparing Waqf to Hinduism’s Moksha and addressing its religious significance. Kapil Sibal argued that Waqf is a divine dedication, unlike mere charity, countering the Centre’s claims. The case highlights the essence of charity across religions and its implications for religious endowments.
The Centre informed the Supreme Court that Waqf, while an Islamic concept, is not an essential religious practice. In defending the Waqf Amendment Act against legal challenges, Solicitor General Mehta emphasized the need for public property protection and clarified that Waqf serves charitable purposes, involving secular functions and consultation with various Muslim bodies.
