The Jammu & Kashmir High Court dismissed a plea seeking to quash an FIR against a man for sending triple talaq via text. Justice Wani stated that instant talaq, whether spoken, written, or electronic, is “void and illegal” under the 2019 Act.
The Supreme Court has called for opinions from NCW, NHRC, and NCPCR while hearing pleas challenging the validity of Talaq-e-Hasan. The case, filed by journalist Benazeer Heena, will be heard finally on November 19, 2025.
Lawyers have played a crucial role in nation-building by upholding the Constitution and ensuring justice, said Amit Shah. Their contributions in protecting fundamental rights and guiding legal reforms have strengthened democracy. He emphasized that legal professionals have shaped the country’s governance through their dedication and expertise. Their efforts continue to safeguard constitutional values and the rule of law.
Today, On 4th February, The Gujarat government has formed a five-member committee to draft a proposal for the implementation of a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in the state. This move aligns with the government’s aim to bring uniformity in personal laws across communities. The committee will study existing laws and suggest necessary reforms. The initiative follows similar efforts by other states to introduce UCC.
Today, On 29th January, The Supreme Court requested the Centre to provide data on the total number of FIRs registered under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. The court was hearing multiple petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Act, which makes the practice of Triple Talaq a criminal offense.
Today (10th Dec): The Supreme Court has taken note of remarks made by Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court during a December 8 event organized by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad’s legal cell.
The apex court, on its administrative side, has sought details and particulars from the High Court regarding the matter, which is currently under consideration.
The Himachal Pradesh High Court clarified that the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019, only criminalizes instantaneous and irrevocable forms of talaq (divorce). The ruling provides key insight into the application of the law regarding Islamic divorce practices in India.
Justice Anil Verma of the Madhya Pradesh High Court emphasized the necessity of a Uniform Civil Code, noting the delayed realization of triple talaq’s unconstitutionality. He made this observation while partly allowing a petition involving charges under the IPC, the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights of Marriage) Act 2019, and the Dowry Prohibition Act 1961.
The Supreme Court granted anticipatory bail to a husband accused of abetting his wife’s suicide, citing that sending a triple talaq notice did not constitute abetment. Despite the illegality of triple talaq, the court found no evidence of abetment. This decision has sparked debate about the spouse’s legal and ethical responsibilities in such cases.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi is set to begin his third term in office, after securing victory in the general elections. His government’s legislative agenda includes centralized administration, anti-terrorism measures, and emphasis on Hindu pride. Legal changes under Modi’s leadership include revoking Article 370, introducing the Indian Justice Code, and pursuing a Uniform Civil Code. The BJP’s political and legal strategies continue to shape India’s future.
