Umar Khalid’s counsel told a Delhi Court that the 2020 riots case under UAPA rests solely on delayed witness statements, with “no physical evidence, other than one speech,” arguing that the prosecution “doesn’t need evidence, it only needs statements.”
![[BREAKING] Delhi Riots 2020 Conspiracy Case: Delhi High Court Seeks Police Reply to Umar Khalid's Bail Plea](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/1666016562_1619124028_khalid.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today (13th March): Umar Khalid, an activist and former JNU scholar, has filed a petition in the Delhi High Court contesting the dropping of charges against individuals accused of attempting to murder him. The court has issued a notice to the Delhi Police and the accused individuals, scheduling further proceedings for May 21. This follows an incident outside the Constitution Club in New Delhi in 2018.
Delhi Riots Conspiracy: Key Insights Ahead of the UAPA Case Hearing The Delhi riots conspiracy case, which has garnered significant attention, is set to undergo day-to-day hearings under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA). Here’s a comprehensive overview of the case’s developments and what to expect: Background: The Delhi Police’s chargesheet alleges a conspiracy to […]
