Mukul Rohatgi Responds to AG’s Justification for Supreme Court Absence: Ditching a Court Hearing Midway Is Not Done

Former Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi responded after AG R Venkataramani justified his Supreme Court absence, saying, “While international arbitration may hold significant financial value, it is fundamentally a commercial issue that pales before a constitutional challenge.”

BREAKING| Tribunal Reforms Act Case| I Became Judge at 42, Perhaps I Didn’t Have Enough Experience Then: CJI Gavai on 50-Year Age Rule

Today, On 7th November, CJI Gavai remarked, “I Became a Judge at 42, Perhaps I Didn’t Have Enough Experience Then,” during the Supreme Court hearing on the Tribunal Reforms Act case, as Senior Advocate Arvind Datar questioned the 50-year minimum age requirement for tribunal appointments.

BREAKING| Tribunal Reforms Act Case | Engaged in Govt’s High-Stakes Arbitration Case: Attorney General Justifies Absence from Hearing

Attorney General clarified that his absence in the Madras Bar Association case was not to delay proceedings but because he was leading the Government of India’s high-stakes arbitration against Reliance, after CJI Gavai expressed displeasure over adjournment.

Madras Bar Association Case| CJI Gavai Slams Repeated Adjournments : Very Unfair to the Court

Today, On 6th November, Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai expressed sharp displeasure over repeated adjournments in the Madras Bar Association case, remarking that it was “very unfair to the Court” and questioning how many more times such delays would be sought.

Toilet Facilities in Courts & Tribunals: Supreme Court Slams High Courts for Delay In Submitting Reports

Supreme Court, toilet facilities, court infrastructure, 20 High Courts, compliance report, judicial infrastructure, court hygiene, tribunals, public facilities, access to sanitation, registrar general, legal directives, court amenities, SC ruling, judicial accountability

Supreme Court: “Tribunals Can Order Transfer Of Property Back To Elderly Parents Under MWPSC Act, 2007”

The Supreme Court of India overturned a Madhya Pradesh High Court ruling, reinforcing the protective intent of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The Court ruled that senior citizens can reclaim property transferred under the condition of care if the transferee fails to provide support. This decision came in a case where an elderly woman, Urmila Dixit, alleged neglect after gifting property to her son, leading to the deed’s cancellation. The Court emphasized the Act’s purpose of safeguarding senior citizens’ rights, ensuring speedy and effective remedies for their protection.

Supreme Court Bats For Permanent Infra For Tribunals: “Prudent Not To Have Outsourced Staff”

The Supreme Court on Thursday batted for a permanent building, along with permanent staff, for the Jammu and Kashmir Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), saying it will be prudent for the government not to deploy outsourced staff in judicial and quasi-judicial bodies. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan was informed by the Centre that a building has been taken on rent for the functioning of the CAT, Jammu and there will be deployment of outsourced staff.

“Glaring Error” In The NGT’s Approach, Tribunal Cannot Rely Solely on Outsourced Opinions for Decisions: SC Rejects NGT Order

The Supreme Court, On Dec 4, criticized the National Green Tribunal (NGT) for relying solely on a joint committee report without independent evaluation, highlighting a “glaring error.” The Court ruled that tribunals must thoroughly examine all evidence and allow parties to present their case, quashing the NGT’s order against M/s Grasim Industries for violating environmental norms.

‘States Must Ensure Appropriate Salaries & Perks for Retired HC Judges Appointed to Tribunals’: CJI Emphasizes Dignity of Their Role

On Friday(27th Sept),The Supreme Court of India emphasized that retired high court judges heading tribunals must receive appropriate salaries and benefits to maintain their dignity. The bench, led by Chief Justice Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, urged state governments to ensure fair compensation or consider appointing individuals from other professions.