The Supreme Court declined to halt tree felling for Ahmedabad’s riverfront project, observing that development must balance environmental concerns. The Court upheld the NGT’s findings and noted planned compensatory afforestation measures.
The Supreme Court has allowed CPWD to construct a water-storage facility and lay pipelines in Buddha Jayanti Park, part of the sensitive Delhi Ridge area. The decision comes despite concerns over possible tree felling and environmental impact raised during the hearing.
The Supreme Court has allowed BMC to cut more trees for the GMLR project, but only if compensatory afforestation is carried out strictly. The court also warned that negligent officers will face stern action.
The Supreme Court closed contempt proceedings against IFS officer Rahul after he apologized for moving the Uttarakhand High Court despite the top court hearing the Corbett case. CJI Gavai said, “The majesty of law is not in punishing the guilty but in forgiving.”
The Supreme Court directed Delhi’s Forest Department to file a detailed report on the 185 acres meant for compensatory afforestation. Justice Surya Kant said afforestation across 18 sites would be more “environmentally and equitably” balanced than a single location.
Today, On 28th May, The Supreme Court described the Delhi Ridge tree-cutting issue as “a case of institutional missteps and administrative overreach,” while letting the Delhi LG and DDA off the hook in the contempt case, citing broader public welfare considerations.
The Supreme Court of India warned the Telangana government over extensive tree cutting in Hyderabad’s Kancha Gachibowli, demanding immediate restoration or facing consequences. The Court emphasized the urgency of environmental protection amid public opposition. A status quo on further tree cutting was imposed, with a follow-up hearing scheduled for July 23.
The Supreme Court of India underscored the constitutional duty to protect trees while reviewing the NHAI’s request to fell over 800 trees for a highway project. The court warned against excessive requests, insisting on the necessity of compensatory afforestation before granting cutting permissions. The case raises concerns about balancing infrastructure development with environmental preservation.
NEW DELHI: On Friday, the Supreme Court of India decided not to interfere in an ongoing case regarding illegal tree felling in Delhi. Instead, it has left the decision to the Delhi High Court on whether it wants to continue hearing the matter, even though a similar issue is under consideration by the apex court.
The Supreme Court reserved its verdict on a contempt plea regarding the illegal felling of trees in Delhi’s Ridge area for road widening, allegedly violating a prior order. Allegations include deliberate disregard for court orders and environmental damage, while authorities claimed they were unaware of restrictions. The court is set to review the case comprehensively.
