![[UPSC Aspirant’s Death Tragedy] Delhi Court Grants Bail to Passer-By SUV Car Driver](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-43.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 1st August, Delhi’s Tis Hazari Court granted bail to Manuj Kathuria, the SUV driver involved in the deaths of three UPSC aspirants. The court had initially denied his bail plea, stating the serious nature of the allegations against him. The incident occurred when his actions allegedly caused flooding at a coaching institute’s basement.
![[UPSC Aspirants' Death Tragedy] Court Rejects Bail to 5 Accused Including Passerby Car Driver](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-10-5.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Delhi’s Tis Hazari Court has sent five accused individuals to 14 days of judicial custody in connection with the tragic drowning of three UPSC aspirants in the basement of Rau’s IAS coaching center. The incident occurred due to flooding in the basement after heavy rain, leading to concerns about safety measures in educational institutions.
![[Swati Maliwal Assault Case] Bibhav Kumar Appeals to SC Against Delhi HC's Bail Order](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-37-3.png?resize=447%2C360&ssl=1)
Today, On 25th July, Bibhav Kumar appealed the Supreme Court to challenge the High Court’s decision denying him bail in the alleged assault case against Swati Maliwal. The case has political implications due to Kumar’s association with Arvind Kejriwal and the Aam Aadmi Party. The legal and political implications of the bail denial raise questions about the intersection of politics and justice in India.
Today(on 16th July),Delhi Police have filed a detailed chargesheet against Bibhav Kumar in the Swati Maliwal assault case. Kumar, a close aide to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, has been remanded to judicial custody until July 30, facing serious IPC charges including assault, intimidation, and offenses against women’s dignity.
The Delhi High Court is expected to decide on Bibhav Kumar’s plea for compensation for his alleged illegal arrest by the Delhi Police. Kumar, a close aide to Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, is accused of assaulting AAP MP Swati Maliwal and is currently in judicial custody. His bail plea has been rejected, and the case carries political implications.
![[Swati Maliwal Assault Case] "Fails to Exercise Judicial Discretion, Issues Mechanical Order": Bibhav Kumar Challenges Delhi Court's Cognizance of Chargesheet](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-23-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 14th June, A Delhi Court extended the judicial custody of Bibhav Kumar by one day in the Swati Maliwal assault case, allowing for further investigation. Kumar, a former aide to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, was remanded on May 31 and had his bail plea rejected. The case holds political implications for the Aam Aadmi Party and raises questions about justice in India.
![[Swati Maliwal Assault Case] Does Delhi Chief Minister Office Need Goons? SC Slams Delhi CM Aide Bibhav Kumar](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Untitled-design-.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Bibhav Kumar, a former aide to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, is seeking regular bail in an alleged assault case involving Swati Maliwal. The Delhi High Court is set to hear the matter on June 14. The victim fears for her safety, citing potential witness influence if Kumar is released. This is the second rejection of his bail application.
Today, On 16th May, Swati Maliwal accuses an unnamed individual of manipulating videos to protect themselves, raising concerns about political tactics and media integrity. She alleges assault by Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s personal secretary and filed an FIR with detailed accounts of the incident. The accused individual’s attempts at self-protection through video manipulation are under scrutiny.
Today(on 2nd March) The Tis Hazari Court in Delhi has concluded the trial of the Ankit Saxena murder case, with sentencing for three convicts reserved for March 7, 2024. The prosecution seeks maximum punishment while the defense pleads for clemency. The court emphasized the pursuit of truth and justice, reflecting the importance of these values in the judicial process.