26/11 Case: Bombay High Court Calls Abu Jundal’s Plea a “Fishing Inquiry,” Quashes Order for Confidential Documents

The Bombay High Court quashed a 2018 special court order directing authorities to share confidential records with 26/11 accused Abu Jundal, calling his request a “fishing and roving inquiry.” The court said the demand was a belated and tactical move unrelated to the main terror case.

BREAKING: Bombay High Court Clears Way for 26/11 Mumbai Terror Trial to Resume After 7 Years

After nearly seven years, the trial against 26/11 accused Abu Jundal will restart as the Bombay High Court quashes a 2018 order blocking proceedings. The court’s decision ends a long legal halt in one of India’s most significant terror cases.

2008 Ahmedabad Blasts: Supreme Court Rejects Death Row Convicts’ Plea for Video Conferencing in Gujarat High Court

The Supreme Court has refused video conferencing in the Ahmedabad blasts appeals, citing grave security risks to judges and witnesses. The Court directed the Gujarat HC to ensure uninterrupted in-person arguments for defence counsel.

Supreme Court Denies Early Release of Terror Convict, Asks Him to Challenge Remission Policy : “If Act Was Committed to Create Fear, It Carries Characteristics of a Terrorist Act”

Today, On 15th July, The Supreme Court refused to grant early release to a terror convict, stating, “If the act was committed to create fear, it carries the characteristics of a terrorist act,” and advised him to challenge the remission policy instead.

“Speedy Trial is Constitutionally Required in Cases Involving Anti-National Activities”| Delhi HC Denies Bail to Jagtar Singh Johal in Murder & UAPA Cases

Today(18th Sept), The Delhi High Court denied the bail plea of UK resident Jagtar Singh Johal, accused of multiple murders and supporting the banned Khalistan Liberation Force. His case has gained significant attention due to its connection to terrorism and anti-national activities.

Umar Khalid’s UAPA Case| Delhi Court Reserves Order on Bail Plea

Today, 13th May, Umar Khalid’s bail plea, filed under UAPA in the Delhi riots case, is pending a decision from the Karkardooma Court. The court reserved the order after arguments from both sides. Khalid’s defense emphasizes lack of substantial evidence and bias in media trial. The Delhi Police, opposing the bail, cited his alleged attempts to influence bail hearings through social media.