The Supreme Court has stayed the Bombay High Court order restoring control of the Shani Shingnapur temple trust and appointed the Nashik divisional commissioner as administrator. The move comes amid concerns over mismanagement, expiring tenure of trustees, and handling of crores in devotees’ offerings.
Madras: The Madras High Court ruled that no caste can claim ownership of a temple or administer it based on caste identity. The Court clarified that such a practice is not a protected religious right under the Indian Constitution. Justice Bharatha Chakravarthy dismissed a plea seeking separate administration of a temple based on caste identity.
The Supreme Court has dismissed Mahant Surendra Nath Avdhoot’s appeal regarding false testimony connected to the Kalkaji Temple administration case. Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna condemned false testimony as a serious crime, contradicting earlier bench views. Additionally, the Delhi High Court is addressing management and safety issues at the temple following a tragic incident.
The Supreme Court of India expressed concerns over the exploitation of temple administration in Uttar Pradesh, particularly regarding advocates appointed as receivers who might delay litigation for personal gain. The Court directed the Principal District Judge of Mathura to report on ongoing temple litigation, emphasizing swift resolutions and better management of temple affairs.