The Supreme Court of India reinforced its 2015 order prohibiting tree felling within 5 kilometers of the Taj Mahal without permission. The ruling applies to the Taj Trapezium Zone, requiring approval from the court for any tree felling and emphasizing compliance with environmental protections, especially concerning other heritage sites.
The Supreme Court of India, led by Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna, has paused new lawsuits while reviewing challenges to the Places of Worship Act. Advocate Hari Shankar Jain advocates restoring demolished Hindu temples, claiming the ruling benefits Hindus. The court will evaluate ongoing cases concerning religious structures in due course.
The Supreme Court today rejected a petition to designate Agra as a World Heritage Site, questioning the benefits and legal provisions for such a declaration. Justices Oka and Masih were skeptical about the potential impact on Agra’s cleanliness and development. The counsel argued for preservation and tourism benefits, but the bench remained unconvinced.
Today,22nd April, The Supreme Court seeks the ASI’s input for a Taj Mahal conservation plan, emphasizing the need for long-term preservation. The ASI’s expertise is crucial for safeguarding the iconic monument. Other directives include addressing the cleaning of the Yamuna river and granting Agra the World Heritage City tag. Further hearings are scheduled for July 11.
The Delhi High Court has instructed the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to address a representation by Surjit Singh Yadav, President of the Hindu Sena, who has raised concerns about what he claims are “wrong historical facts” regarding the construction of the Taj Mahal by Shah Jahan. The division bench, comprising Chief Justice Satish Chandra […]
