Today, On 17th December, the Supreme Court directed the Malankara Orthodox and Jacobite factions to maintain the current status quo regarding church management until a hearing scheduled for January 2025. The court emphasized the state’s role in ensuring peace and requested data on the population and properties of both denominations amid ongoing disputes.
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) is contesting a trial court’s refusal to recognize its charges against AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan in a money laundering case tied to alleged Delhi Waqf Board irregularities. Justice Ohri stressed the necessity of addressing sanction issues as the High Court scheduled the next hearing for January 2025.
Isha Foundation has filed a defamation suit against Nakkheeran for publishing critical allegations against it. Seeking Rs 3 crore in damages, the case, scheduled to begin arguments in April 2025, involves claims of misconduct. The Supreme Court previously ruled that two women at the ashram are there voluntarily, prompting ongoing investigations.
![[SBI Service Rules] "Once an Employee Retires, Disciplinary Proceedings Are Void": SC on Post-Service Actions](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-58.png?resize=322%2C157&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court of India ruled that disciplinary proceedings against SBI employees cannot start after retirement, as such actions are void unless permitted by law. The ruling clarifies that the employment relationship ends at retirement, emphasizing employers must comply with legal standards when addressing past employee misconduct.
Today, On 24th October, the Supreme Court criticized a petition requesting an investigation into Karnataka High Court Judge M. Nagaprasanna’s recusal, allowing its withdrawal. The Court deemed the petition inappropriate, expressing concerns about potential misinterpretations of judicial conduct and emphasizing the importance of respecting judicial discretion without implying ulterior motives against judges.
The Supreme Court temporarily stayed the investigation into an FIR against a man who called Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge “ayogya” (incompetent). This follows a challenge to the Karnataka High Court’s ruling, which upheld charges under specific IPC sections for inciting violence and promoting enmity, while dismissing those under the SC/ST Act.
![[Alleged Electoral Bond Scam] Charges Against Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman: Bengaluru Police To Move Court Seeking CID Probe](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/image-490.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Bengaluru police may transfer the electoral bonds case against Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman and BJP leaders to the CID due to complex corruption allegations. Following a court-ordered FIR, officials are discussing this move, given the magnitude of the case involving over Rs. 8,000 crore and significant political implications amidst opposition demands for investigation.
Former Delhi Health Minister Satyendar Jain filed a bail application in a money laundering case, prompting Special CBI Judge Rakesh Syal to issue a notice to the Enforcement Directorate. The bail hearing is set for September 25, with the main case on October 5. Jain was arrested in May 2022 and denies wrongdoing.
The Supreme Court of India has ruled that real estate developers must obtain both a completion certificate and a fire safety clearance before offering possession of a flat, deeming it illegal to do otherwise. This landmark decision reinforces homebuyers’ rights by ensuring developers are accountable for securing all necessary approvals.
The Allahabad High Court expressed concern over delays in releasing seized vehicles in Uttar Pradesh, noting 10-15 daily applications for release. Despite Supreme Court guidelines, vehicles remain neglected. The Court ordered a report from District Judges and suggested a web portal for vehicle details. It warned of the risks of improper releases and set a further hearing for September 18.