The Supreme Court of India denied anticipatory bail to a husband accused of brutal domestic violence, with Justices Aravind Kumar and P. B. Varale observing that a husband cannot “treat his wife like an animal” under marriage’s protection
The Supreme Court of India observed that para-teachers cannot be expected to secure children’s education while remaining in unstable employment, stressing that long-term teacher-student relationships require continuity and certainty, while hearing appeals by Jharkhand para-teachers seeking regularization after decades of contractual service.
The Supreme Court of India set aside default bail granted in the Haldwani riot case, directing accused to surrender, holding the Uttarakhand High Court wrongly criticised the investigating officer for delay beyond 90 days.
Supreme Court of India upheld NCLAT order restoring CoC in Think & Learn Private Limited insolvency. Bench of Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice Vijay Bishnoi dismissed appeal by Byju Raveendran.
Supreme Court of India expanded definition of acid attack victims under Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016. Bench of Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi included internal injuries and ingestion cases.
Supreme Court of India refused urgent plea to continue central forces in West Bengal post elections. Bench of Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi said decision rests with executive.
Supreme Court of India questioned All India Trinamool Congress objections to central staff in counting, calling it a “fallacy”. Court stressed trust in Election Commission of India and neutrality of officials.
The Supreme Court of India has cleared Anurag Thakur and Parvesh Sahib Singh Verma of allegations of hate speech during the January 2020 anti-CAA protests in Delhi, accepting the finding that no cognizable offence was made out against them.
Today, On 30th April, The Supreme Court on Tuesday reserved its verdict on Congress leader Pawan Khera’s anticipatory bail plea in a defamation and forgery case lodged by the Assam Police. Senior Advocate A.M. Singhvi said, “Dr. B.R. Ambedkar would turn in his grave…”
Supreme Court of India refused fresh directions on hate speech, citing adequate laws. Bench of Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta stressed issue lies in enforcement, not legislative gaps.
